Ershov Yu.G.

The study represents a conceptual understanding of common principles and standards of public control in different areas of public administration, the formation of a unified information and methodological framework for monitoring, development of international experience. Methods. In the article the authors used: system analysis, scientific methods; historical and logical methods, comparative method with a view to identifying common and special features in the analysis of the mechanism of social control; prediction methods, synthesis, generalization. The distinguishing feature of the methods used in the article is their close relationship with the normative base, which provides integration of public (civilian) control and public administration. Results. Proceeding from the specificity of the object of the research the authors: 1. Grounded theoretical aspects of the study of the relationship of public (civilian) control and public administration. 2. Introduced the characteristics of Western political-journalistic discourse on the investigated problem. 3. Offered a series of recommendations on implementation of the broad objectives of strengthening and development of mechanisms of public control. 4. Suggested the ways of improvement of social and political activity of citizens, their legal culture and the involvement of citizens, NGOs and other actors of civil society in monitoring the management scope of imperious-managerial sphere. Scientific novelty. Scientific novelty and originality consists in the analysis of the problems of the relationship of public administration and public (civilian) control, as well as the proposed criteria for its effectiveness at the federal and regional level.

Purpose. This article discusses Bolshevism and Stalinism through the influence of political, social and historical conditions and factors of continuity and rupture in their relationship. Methods. Retrospective analysis uses a system-genetic method in the study of the causes of Stalinism, structural-functional method to justify their unity, sociocultural-methodology in the study of the transition from Bolshevism to Stalinism. Principles of historical dialectical studies. Results. Specific historical mechanisms of Bolshevism of Stalinism development, the distinction between «old» and «new» Bolshevism, Stalinism paradoxes as an expression of the nature of the October revolution were studied. Scientific novelty. The continuity of Bolshevism and Stalinism in the organization of inner party life and their quality gap in the party and ideological orientations were disclosed.

Purpose. Authors develop a preventive model of political decision-making, as well as showing its higher efficiency in comparison with the reactive model, aimed at the redistribution. Methods. The methodological framework of the study of political decision-making process is based on a new approach, according to which political decisions are considered from the perspective of the implementation of power capacity in the long term that allow to develop a preventive model of political decision-making. Results and scientific novelty. The novelty and the main result of the study are to establish a preventive model of political decision-making that takes into account the diversity of political decision-making in terms of the conditions and the time of their implementation that allow to increase the effectiveness of achieving the long-term political goals.

Purpose. On the basis of the national security problems analysis to justify the relationship of their solution with public policy issues of regional development. In addition, the purpose of the article is to provide proposals for improving public management of regional development as a factor of national security based on the comparative analysis of such models in the RF and the US. Methods.The following methods are used in the research: system analysis, scientific methods; historical and logical methods, comparative method to determine the general and the particular in regional development; statistical analysis method; methods of forecasting, synthesis, generalization. Results. Due to the specific nature of research object the authors state: on the whole, the regional development policy in the US and in Russia has common features, it aims at developing the socio-economic status of the regions. in the field of regional development the American management model is more efficient and flexible, the need for law-making occurs in case of socio-economic problems and needs, and, as a rule, is generally well integrated into the existing management model. Russia emphasises the use of power in the executive authorities. It is quite difficult to rationalize executive bodies. The RF management system is focused on the»trial and error» pattern. the problems of security management improvement can only be solved with the involvement of civil society institutions, which implies revision of the absolute public influence in the field of security. civil society emerges as a feedback institution in the cooperation with the state in order to optimize social processes. To ensure regional development in the field of national security the technologies influencing the public power structures should be provided that would, first of all, resolve social problems. Scientific novelty. The comparative analysis of models of regional development management enables to identify the general and the particular in the models and to focus on the problems of improving the public administration of regional development as a factor of national security.