Общественный (гражданский) контроль и публичное управление

Abstract

The study represents a conceptual understanding of common principles and standards of public control in different areas of public administration, the formation of a unified information and methodological framework for monitoring, development of international experience. Methods. In the article the authors used: system analysis, scientific methods; historical and logical methods, comparative method with a view to identifying common and special features in the analysis of the mechanism of social control; prediction methods, synthesis, generalization. The distinguishing feature of the methods used in the article is their close relationship with the normative base, which provides integration of public (civilian) control and public administration. Results. Proceeding from the specificity of the object of the research the authors: 1. Grounded theoretical aspects of the study of the relationship of public (civilian) control and public administration. 2. Introduced the characteristics of Western political-journalistic discourse on the investigated problem. 3. Offered a series of recommendations on implementation of the broad objectives of strengthening and development of mechanisms of public control. 4. Suggested the ways of improvement of social and political activity of citizens, their legal culture and the involvement of citizens, NGOs and other actors of civil society in monitoring the management scope of imperious-managerial sphere. Scientific novelty. Scientific novelty and originality consists in the analysis of the problems of the relationship of public administration and public (civilian) control, as well as the proposed criteria for its effectiveness at the federal and regional level.