Government and public administration

TRANSFORMATION OF THE SPECIFICS OF POLITICAL MANIPULATION IN "NEW MEDIA"

Received: 15.06.2018 Published: 15.06.2018

UDC: 32.019.51:004 EDN: YUNNWX DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2018-6-7-12

Full text

Abstract

The article presents a new approach to the analysis of the phenomenon of political manipulation. The authors note that the topic of political manipulation, in general, is sufficiently developed in the domestic and foreign scientific literature. However, in the overwhelming majority of studies on political manipulation, this phenomenon is considered in an obsolete context: as a rule, the specifics of manipulating a particular person through traditional media are studied. In this regard, the authors consider it relevant to explore the features of political manipulation in accordance with the challenges of our time, namely, the active use of “new media” in society. Political manipulation is considered in the article as a type of modern Internet communication. A comparison is made of the peculiarities of political manipulation in the "new media" with the phenomenon of "rhizome" described by French philosophers postmodernists Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari. According to the authors, the key feature of modern Internet communication, and therefore political manipulation, is rhizomorphization... The article presents a new approach to the analysis of the phenomenon of political manipulation. The authors note that the topic of political manipulation, in general, is sufficiently developed in the domestic and foreign scientific literature. However, in the overwhelming majority of studies on political manipulation, this phenomenon is considered in an obsolete context: as a rule, the specifics of manipulating a particular person through traditional media are studied. In this regard, the authors consider it relevant to explore the features of political manipulation in accordance with the challenges of our time, namely, the active use of “new media” in society. Political manipulation is considered in the article as a type of modern Internet communication. A comparison is made of the peculiarities of political manipulation in the "new media" with the phenomenon of "rhizome" described by French philosophers postmodernists Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari. According to the authors, the key feature of modern Internet communication, and therefore political manipulation, is rhizomorphization. The authors define this concept as the process of transforming a linear form of communication into a network, chaotic system of equal actors. Based on this concept, the authors derive a new type of political manipulation rhizomorphic. A characteristic feature of this type of political manipulation is the viral nature of the spread. The main form of the virus is the political meme. Separately emphasizes the changing role of the subject and object in the process of transforming political manipulation from linear to rhizomorphic. A model of rhizomorphic political manipulation is presented, in which any Internet user can act as an object of political manipulation (a consumer of political content) and a subject of political manipulation (producer and distributor of political content) at the same time. function show_eabstract() { $('#eabstract1').hide(); $('#eabstract2').show(); $('#eabstract_expand').hide(); } ▼Показать полностью

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Куньщиков С., Строганов В. Трансформация специфики политического манипулирования в "новых медиа" // Вопросы управления. 2018. Т. 36, № 6. С. 7–12. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2018-6-7-12

For citation:

Kunshchikov S., Stroganov V. TRANSFORMATION OF THE SPECIFICS OF POLITICAL MANIPULATION IN "NEW MEDIA" // Management Issues. 2018. Vol. 36, no. 6. P. 7–12. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2018-6-7-12

How to Cite

Kunshchikov S., Stroganov V. TRANSFORMATION OF THE SPECIFICS OF POLITICAL MANIPULATION IN "NEW MEDIA" // Management Issues. 2018. Vol. 36, no. 6. P. 7–12. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2018-6-7-12

References

  1. Кара-Мурза С.Г. Манипуляция сознанием. М.: Эксмо, 2012. С. 32.
  2. Доценко Е. Л. Психология манипуляции: феномены, механизмы и защита. М.: ЧеРо. МГУ, 1997. С. 59.
  3. Шиллер Г. Манипуляторы сознанием /под ред. Я. Н. Засурского. М.: Мысль, 1980. С. 99.
  4. Van Dijk T. Disсourse and manipulation // Disсourse & Soсiety. 2006. Т. 17(2). С. 360.
  5. Zivaljeviс. A. Positive Manipulation Theory A Base for Сontinuous Motivation. // Positive Manipulation. Theory a base for сontinuous motivation. [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.mixprize.org/sites/default/files/media/posts/doсuments/Positive Manipulation Theory.pdf (дата обращения 28.10.2017).
  6. Beсk E. The Logiс of Manipulation: 33 Teсhniques of Romanian Politiсal Manipulation. Buсuresti, 2010. P.12.
  7. Рогалева О.С. Новые медиа: эволюция понятия (аналитический обзор) // Вестник Омского университета. 2015. №1. С. 223.
  8. Пашигорова Л. Old media vs new media в политической коммуникации // Бизнес. Общество. Власть. 2010. №4. С.116.
  9. Богдановская И.М. Медиа-коммуникация // Вестник Герценовского университета. 2011. №8. С.79.
  10. Шестеркина Л.П. Основные характеристики новых социальных медиа // Ученые записки Забайкальского государственного университета. Серия: Филология, история, востоковедение. 2014. №2. С.109.
  11. Кунеева Л.И. Новые Медиа как реализация информационно-коммуникационных технологий в сети интернет // Вестник Саратовского государственного социально-экономического университета. 2013. №3. С.179.
  12. Современная западная философия: Словарь. М.: ТОН Остожье, 1998. С. 357.
  13. Академик. Новейший философский словарь. [электронный ресурс]. URL: https://diс.aсademiс.ru/diс.nsf/diс_new_philosophy/1020/ризома (дата обращения 05.03.2018).
  14. Делёз Жиль, Гваттари Феликс. Тысяча плато: глава первая // Альманах «Восток». [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.situation.ru/app/j_art_1023.htm (дата обращения 05.03.2018).
  15. Строганов В.Б. Мобилизация политической активности подростков: манипуляция сознанием или проявлением гражданственности // Материалы ХХ Международной конференции памяти проф. Л.Н. Когана «Культура, личность, общество в современном мире: методология, опыт эмпирического исследования». 2017. С. 1379.
  16. Фурсов А.И. Борьба вопросов. Идеология и психоистория: русское и мировое измерения. М.: Книжный мир, 2017. С. 458.
  17. Зиновьева Н. А. Роль интернет-мемов в воспроизводстве интернет-культуры // Электронный научный архив УрФУ. [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/32403/1/klo_2015_25.pdf (дата обращения 10.08.2017)
  18. 360TV. Названы самые популярные социальные сети в России. [электронный ресурс]. URL: https://360tv.ru/news/obsсhestvo/soсialnie-seti/ (дата обращения 03.08.2018)
  19. Аудитория Вконтакте. [электронный ресурс]. URL: https://vk.сom/page-47200925_44240810 (дата обращения 04.08.2018)
  20. Каталог пользователей Вконтакте. [электронный ресурс]. URL: https://vk.сom/сatalog.php (дата обращения 04.08.2018)