«DOES THE GOVERNMENT TRUST THE SOCIETY»: RUSSIAN REGIONS PILOT RESEARCH EXPERIENCE
PDF (Russian)
XML (Russian)

Supplementary Files

Список источников (Russian)
References

Keywords

Trust, authority, representatives of public authorities, trust-based attitudes, public administration, Russia

How to Cite

«DOES THE GOVERNMENT TRUST THE SOCIETY»: RUSSIAN REGIONS PILOT RESEARCH EXPERIENCE. (2025). Management Issues, 19(4), 124-138. https://voprosy-upravleniya.owebs.ru/article/view/1290

Abstract

Introduction. In the «state – society» system, trust is primarily considered as a problem of trust between society and the state. The author of the article put the opposite question: how much does the government trust society, and what are the consequences of such trust/distrust. Despite the apparent obviousness of this question, such studies are on the periphery of the social sciences, and there remains little methodology and empirical verification of their conduct. The author set a goal to conduct a pilot study in order to test the methodology for assessing the level of trust of representatives of public authorities, represented by state and municipal employees, in society.

Materials and methods. The main research method is a questionnaire using a specialized online survey service for representatives of public authorities in the financial and economic sphere from 19 subjects of the Russian Federation. Three key objects of trust in the «society» have been identified: citizens, business and state (municipal) institutions.

Results and conclusions. The author has developed a research model on the problem of trust in government and society, which includes the structure of social trust and factors determining the level of trust in government and society. The pilot study confirmed the need for a differentiated study of trust, and the irreducibility of its analysis to direct questions about trust. The need for a study of the heterogeneity of the perception of different representatives of society by the authorities has been identified. It has been shown that the government's trust in citizens, business, and state (municipal) institutions varies significantly: the greatest degree of trust of representatives of public authorities is shown in relation to citizens, the least – to business. The position in the power vertical significantly affects the level of trust of government officials in society. The study demonstrates that the declared trust attitudes are not always converted into practical actions, which creates certain barriers in the public administration system.

Discussion. The results obtained can be useful for improving the methodology of conducting such research, developing mechanisms for interaction between government and society, as well as for developing the theory of social trust in the context of public administration. The study makes a significant contribution to understanding the mechanisms of trust formation in the public administration system and can serve as a methodological basis for further research in this area.

PDF (Russian)
XML (Russian)

References

Валевич А. Г., Кудряшов В. С., Фомина В. В. Тенденции и тренды современного управления в России и за рубежом // Ученые записки Тамбовского отделения РоСМУ. 2023. № 29. С. 44–51. EDN RIECFW.

Van de Walle S. New public management: restoring the public trust through creating distrust? // The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management / Ed. by T. Christensen, P. Laegreid. Aldershot: 2010. Ashgate, pp. 309–320. DOI 10.2139/ssrn.1594042.

Van de Walle S., Lahat L. Do public official trust citizens? A welfare state perspective // Social Policy & Administration. 2017. Vol. 51. No. 7, pp. 1450–1469. DOI 10.1111/spol.12234.

Красильников Д. Г., Троицкая Е. А. Концепция «New Public Management»: возможности и ограничения // Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: Политология. 2011. № 1. С. 81–91. EDN NUOWAP.

Андрюшенков В. А., Денисов Ю. П. Парадигма государственного и муниципального управления в России в контексте современных политических процессов // Общество: политика, экономика, право. 2022. № 11. С. 21–25. DOI 10.24158/pep.2022.11.2. EDN QKHOGH.

Антончева О. А., Апанасенко Т. Е. Отношение государства к криптовалюте как индикатор его доверия к обществу // Управленческое консультирование. 2020. № 11. С. 130–139. DOI 10.22394/1726-1139-2020-11-130-139. EDN ONXRVV.

Alkadry M. G. Deliberative discourse between citizens and administrators: if citizen talk, will administrators listen? // Administration and Society. 2003. Vol. 35. No. 2. pp. 184–209. DOI 10.1177/0095399703035002004. EDN JKJRDL.

Berman E. M. Dealing with cynical citizens // Public Administration Review. 1997. Vol. 57. No. 2. pp. 105–112. DOI 10.2307/977058. EDN EPZCOR.

Melkers J., Thomas J. C. What do administrators think citizens think? Administrators predictions as an adjunct to citizen surveys // Public Administration Review. 1998. Vol. 58. No. 4. pp. 327–334. DOI 10.2307/977562. EDN EQAELR.

Бондаренко В. В., Юдина В. А., Юрасов И. А., Танина М. А. Эмоциональное и рациональное доверие российской студенческой молодежи к органам власти: проблемы образов власти // Известия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион. Общественные науки. 2023. № 4 (68). С. 43–61. DOI 10.21685/2072-3016-2023-4-4. EDN ECKCYX.

Петренко Д. В. Реформа МВД России: как изменилось доверие общества к полиции за двенадцать лет // Вестник науки. 2023. Т. 2, № 12 (69). С. 820–824. EDN XPBOGB.

Герасин В. Ю. Влияние явки на выборы Президента России на доверие населения к органам государственной власти // Молодежь. Образование. Наука. 2024. № 1 (19). С. 182-185. EDN KFCWPO.

Yang K. Public administrators’ trust in citizens: a missing link in citizen involvement efforts // Public Administration Review. 2005. Vol. 65. No. 3. P. 274–285. DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00453.x.

Migchelbrink K., Raymaekers P. Public managers’ trust in citizens and their preferences for behavioral policy instruments: evidence from a mixed-methods study // Behavioral Public Policy. 2022. In Press. 24 p. DOI 10.1017/bpp.2022.21.

Овчинников-Лысенко Е. Г. Методология и методы социологических исследований социальной справедливости в России и за рубежом // Общество: социология, психология, педагогика. 2025. № 5 (133). С. 32–38. DOI 10.24158/spp.2025.5.3. EDN NQZZUG.

Казакова М. С., Карлина А. А., Чумак В. Г. Оценка эффективности публичного управления в России и за рубежом: анализ теоретических подходов и практик // Вестник Самарского муниципального института управления. 2024. № 4. С. 7–19. EDN PUWLNH.

Сиразетдинова М. Ф. Российские социологи об основаниях солидарности: субъектность, предсказуемость и общность чувств // Вестник Института социологии. 2024. Т. 15, № 1. С. 70–90. DOI 10.19181/vis.2024.15.1.3. EDN QGEQFM.

Захаров Н. Л., Половникова Т. В. Новые социально-экономические тренды современного мира // Социально-экономическое управление: теория и практика. 2023. Т. 19, № 2. С. 43–48. DOI 10.22213/2618-9763-2023-2-43-48. EDN PQLFNA.

Костюнина О. В. Доверие к власти как условие достижения национальных целей развития России на современном этапе: теория и правовое регулирование // Академический юридический журнал. 2025. Т. 26, № 1 (99). С. 35–43. DOI 10.17150/1819-0928.2025.26(1).35-43. EDN RKOUMH.

Бычкова Е. И., Литвин А. С. К вопросу о совершенствовании института ответственности государственных служащих в Российской Федерации (на основе опыта правления Петра I) // Вестник Академии Следственного комитета Российской Федерации. 2022. № 2 (32). С. 28–33. DOI 10.54217/2588-0136.2022.32.2.003. EDN PFFKPS.

Горькова В. В., Курлов А. В., Юрченко Д. А. [и др.] Научные и нормативные аспекты реализации устойчивого развития в России и за рубежом // Экономика и безопасность. 2024. № 4. С. 12–18. EDN WHMOTU.

Valevich, A. G., Kudryashov, V. S., Fomina, V. V. (2023) Trends and trends of modern management in Russia and abroad. Scientific notes of the Tambov branch of RoSMU, (29), pp. 44–51. https://elibrary.ru/riecfw.

Van de Walle, S. (2010) New public management: restoring the public trust through creating distrust? The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management / Ed. by T. Christensen, P. Laegreid. Aldershot, Ashgate, pp. 309–320. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1594042.

Van de Walle, S., Lahat, L. (2017) Do public official trust citizens? A welfare state perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 51 (7), pp. 1450–1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12234.

Krasilnikov, D. G., Troitskaya, E. A. (2011) The concept of «New Public Management»: opportunities and limitations. Perm University Herald. Political Science, (1), pp. 81–91. https://elibrary.ru/nuowap.

Andryushenkov, V. A., Denisov, Yu. P. (2022) The paradigm of state and municipal management in Russia in the context of modern political processes. Society: politics, economics, Law, (11), pp. 21–25. https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2022.11.2. https://elibrary.ru/qkhogh.

Antoncheva, O. A., Apanasenko, T. E. (2020) The State’s Attitude to Cryptocurrency as an Indicator of Its Trust in Society. Administrative consulting, (11), pp. 130–139. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-11-130-139. https://elibrary.ru/onxrvv.

Alkadry, M. G. (2003) Deliberative discourse between citizens and administrators: if citizen talk, will administrators listen? Administration & Society, 35 (2), pp. 184–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399703035002004. https://elibrary.ru/jkjrdl.

Berman, E. M. (1997) Dealing with cynical citizens. Public Administration Review, 57 (2), pp. 105–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/977058. https://elibrary.ru/epzcor.

Melkers, J., Thomas, J. C. (1998) What do administrators think citizens think? Administrators predictions as an adjunct to citizen surveys. Public Administration Review, 58 (4), pp. 327–334. https://doi.org/10.2307/977562. https://elibrary.ru/eqaelr.

Bondarenko, V. V., Yudina, V. A., Yurasov, I. A., Tanina, M. A. (2023) Emotional and rational trust of the Russian student youth’s trust in governing bodies: problems of images of the authority. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Obshchestvennye nauki = University proceedings. Volga region. Social sciences, (4), pp. 43–61. https://doi.org/10.21685/2072-3016-2023-4-4. https://elibrary.ru/eckcyx.

Petrenko, D. V. (2023) Reform of Russian police: how has public trust in police changed in twelve years. Bulletin of Science, 2 (12), pp. 820–824. https://elibrary.ru/xpbogb.

Gerasin, V. Yu. (2024) The influence of turnout in the Russian presidential election on public confidence in public authorities. Youth. Education. Science, 1(19), pp. 182-185. https://elibrary.ru/kfcwpo.

Yang, K. (2005) Public administrators’ trust in citizens: a missing link in citizen involvement efforts. Public Administration Review, 65 (3), pp. 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00453.x.

Migchelbrink, K., Raymaekers, P. (2022) Public managers’ trust in citizens and their preferences for behavioral policy instruments: evidence from a mixed-methods study. Behavioral Public Policy, In Press, 24 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2022.21.

Ovchinnikov-Lysenko, E. G. (2025) The Results of Empirical Research on Social Justice in Russia and Abroad. Society: Sociology, psychology, pedagogy, 5(133), pp. 32–38. https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2025.5.3. https://elibrary.ru/nqzzug.

Kazakova, M. S., Karlina, A. A., Chumak, V. G. (2024) Assessment of the public administration efficiency in russia and abroad: analysis of theoretical approaches and practices. Bulletin of the Samara Municipal Institute of Management, (4), pp. 7–19. https://elibrary.ru/puwlnh.

Sirazetdinova, M. F. (2024) Russian sociologists on the foundations of solidarity: subjectivity, predictability and community of feelings. Vestnik instituta sotziologii, 15 (1), pp. 70–90. https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2024.15.1.3 https://elibrary.ru/qgeqfm.

Zakharov, N. L., Polovnikova, T. V. (2023) New socio-economic trends in the modern world. Social’noekonomiceskoe upravlenie: teoria i praktika, 19 (2), pp. 43–48. https://doi.org/10.22213/2618-9763-2023-2-43-48. https://elibrary.ru/pqlfna.

Kostyunina, O. V. (2025) Trust in government as a condition for achieving Russia's national development goals at the present stage: theory and legal regulation. Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy journal = Academic Law Journal, 26 (1), pp. 35–43. https://doi.org/10.17150/1819-0928.2025.26(1).35-43. https://elibrary.ru/rkoumh.

Bychkova, E. I., Litvin, A. S. (2022) On the issue of improving the institution of responsibility of civil servants in the Russian Federation (based on the experience of the reign of Peter the Great). Bulletin of the Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, (2), pp. 28–33. https://doi.org/10.54217/2588-0136.2022.32.2.003. https://elibrary.ru/pffkps.

Gorkova, V. V., Kurlov, A. V., Yurchenko, D. A. Dozmorov, A. M., Belykh, A. D. (2024) Scientific and regulatory aspects of the implementation of sustainable development in Russia and abroad. Economy and security, (4), pp. 12–18. https://elibrary.ru/whmotu.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Management Issues

Received: 16 June 2025 · Revised: 30 September 2025 · Accepted: 30 October 2025