Government and public administration

Social determinism as the official ideology of Russia: methodological aspect

Received: 15.04.2020 Published: 15.04.2020

EDN: HLQHDC DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2020-4-6-18

Full text

Abstract

Problem definition. The growth of competition in the global world makes it necessary to ensure the sustainable development of Russia. The corresponding national idea is a system-forming element of the official ideology of Russia. The current official ideology does not meet the requirements of sustainable development and corresponds to the civilizational culture of the Russian people, which updates the need to develop a new official ideology of the country.Purpose: to substantiate the methodology for the structural responsibility development of the official ideology model in Russia.Methodological base. The paper substantiates the methodology for the structural responsibility development of the official ideology model in Russia, which includes arguments for the advisability of synergy of its main elements: the idea of sustainable development of the country, relevant goals, universal ideals, standards and changing values, public consciousness and beliefs.Method of research. To substantiate the structural responsibility of the model of the official ideology of Russia, methods of analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction, and the method of system identification of the studied objects were used.Results. A model of the official ideology of Russia is formed. It is based on the interaction of ideals, standards and changing values. The analysis of the existing types of ideologies is carried out, as a result of which the conclusion is made about the expediency of choosing the ideology of social determinism as the ideological and content basis of the official ideology of Russia. The structural responsibility is substantiated and the model of the official ideology of Russia is formed. It includes a strategic element - the idea of sustainability, a driving force - objectives, basic principles - ideals, a functional center - standards, a methodical basis - changing values, a regulator - the public consciousness and adjustable parameters - the persuasion, the synergy of which contributes to the development of an adequate social philosophy and mentality.Practical significance. The proposed model of the official ideology of the country can be used in the theory and practice of managing the development of Russia, as well as in the legislative process.Scientific novelty: it consists in substantiating a theoretical and methodological approach to the formation of a model of the official ideology of Russia in modern conditions of global instability.Conclusions. The use of official ideology in the proposed form contributes to the development of an adequate public outlook and mentality, supports the motivation of public sentiment towards the successful implementation of the sustainable development goals, and the state becomes an effective leader and initiator of social transformations in the country.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Подгорный В.В. СОЦИАЛЬНЫЙ ДЕТЕРМИНИЗМ КАК ОФИЦИАЛЬНАЯ ИДЕОЛОГИЯ РОССИИ: МЕТОДОЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ АСПЕКТ // Вопросы управления. 2020. Т. 65, № 4. С. 6–18. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2020-4-6-18

For citation:

Podgornyy V.V. Social determinism as the official ideology of Russia: methodological aspect // Management Issues. 2020. Vol. 65, no. 4. P. 6–18. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2020-4-6-18

How to Cite

Podgornyy V.V. Social determinism as the official ideology of Russia: methodological aspect // Management Issues. 2020. Vol. 65, no. 4. P. 6–18. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2020-4-6-18

References

  1. Зарубина Е.В. (2016). Проблема формирования общенациональной идеологии в России // Манускрипт. № 11 (73). С. 51-53.
  2. Zarubina E.V. (2016). The problem of the formation of a nationwide ideology in Russia, Manuscript, no. 11 (73), pp. 51-53.
  3. Радиков И.В. (2019). Поиск идеологических ориентиров в постсоветской России // Вестник Московского государственного лингвистического университета. Общественные науки. № 1 (834). С. 54-73.
  4. Radikov I.V. (2019). Search for ideological guidelines in post-Soviet Russia, Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Social Sciences, no. 1 (834), pp. 54-73.
  5. Царёв Р.Ю. (2017). Какая идеология нужна современной России? // Социум и власть. № 5 (67). С. 20-25.
  6. Tsarev R.Yu. (2017). What ideology does modern Russia need?, Society and Power, no. 5 (67), pp. 20-25.
  7. Вольтер О.В. (2009). Феномен идеологии в современной России // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4. История. № 1 (15). С. 134-139.
  8. Volter O.V. (2009). The phenomenon of ideology in modern Russia, Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series 4. History, no. 1 (15), pp. 134-139.
  9. Ролдугина О.Ю. (2014). Национальная идеология и её роль в управлении российским обществом в условиях глобализации // Вестник университета. № 4. С. 86-89.
  10. Roldugina O.Yu. (2014). National ideology and its role in the management of Russian society in the context of globalization, University Bulletin, no. 4, pp. 86-89.
  11. Гурушкин П.Ю. (2015). Консервативные идеологии в политической системе современной России: концепции, тенденции и применение в государственном управлении // Вопросы управления. № 4. С. 13-19.
  12. Gurushkin P.Yu. (2015). Conservative ideologies in the political system of modern Russia: concepts, trends and application in public administration, Management Issues, no. 4, pp. 13-19.
  13. Лотарёв К.А. (2016). К вопросу интерпретации и поиска идеологии: возможности консерватизма в условиях идеологической конвергенции современной России (часть 1) // Философия права. № 3 (76). С. 34-41.
  14. Lotarev K.A. (2016). On the question of interpretation and search for ideology: the possibilities of conservatism in the conditions of ideological convergence of modern Russia (part 1), Philosophy of Law, no. 3 (76), pp. 34-41.
  15. Подгорный В.В. (2016). Феномен идеологии в управлении социальным развитием общества // Вопросы управления. № 2 (20). С. 13-24.
  16. Podgorny V.V. (2016). The phenomenon of ideology in the management of social development of society, Management Issues, no. 2 (20), pp. 13-24.
  17. Подгорный В.В. (2015). Моделирование - главный принцип структурирования управления социальным развитием общества // Менеджмент в России и за рубежом. № 2. С. 40-48.
  18. Podgorny V.V. (2015). Modeling is the main principle of structuring the management of social development of society, Management in Russia and Abroad, no. 2, pp. 40-48.
  19. Подгорный В.В. (2019). Особенности устойчивого развития и технология его обеспечения на государственном уровне // Менеджер. № 4 (90). С. 78-92.
  20. Podgorny V.V. (2019). Features of sustainable development and technology of its support at the state level, Manager, no. 4 (90), pp. 78-92.
  21. Кривошеин И.Т. (2011). О сущности сознания // Вестник Томского государственного университета. № 348. С. 96-99.
  22. Krivoshein I.T. (2011). On the essence of consciousness, Bulletin of Tomsk State University, no. 348, pp. 96-99.