Government and public administration
The level of infrastructure support for entrepreneurship: opinions of experts from various countries
Received: 15.03.2020 Published: 15.03.2020
UDC: 338.49(100) EDN: ZWISGK DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2020-3-88-97
Full text
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the main infrastructure elements of business development in various countries, according to experts from these countries. These elements were: knowledge and technology transfer infrastructure; commercial and professional infrastructure; production and information infrastructure; market infrastructure; institutions providing easy access to existing markets; and social and cultural infrastructure. Methods. The research is based on methods of economic analysis, analogies, generalizations, classification, system, and structural approaches. Information from the Global entrepreneurship monitoring project report for 54 countries was used as input data. The estimation of the distribution of the values of indicators reflecting the opinions of experts from these countries on the effectiveness of the six main infrastructure elements of business development was based on modeling of empirical data using normal distribution density functions. Results. During the study, the average values of indicators that characterize experts’ opinions on a scale of ten about the effectiveness of each of the six key infrastructure elements of business development, and the intervals of their changes, characteristic for the majority of countries were determined. It is proved that the highest average value for countries is marked by an indicator that, according to experts, characterizes the efficiency of production and information infrastructure. And the lowest average value is typical for such an indicator as the efficiency of the knowledge and technology transfer infrastructure. The tasks of identifying countries with high and low levels of efficiency of each of the main elements have been solved. It is shown that the values of each of the six indicators under consideration are significantly differentiated across 54 countries. The absence of links between the values of each of the considered indicators and such factors as the level of income of the population in specific countries and their geographical location is confirmed. Scientific novelty. New knowledge about the effectiveness of infrastructure elements of business development in various countries has been obtained.
Keywords
How to cite
Для цитирования:
Пиньковецкая Ю.С. Уровень инфраструктурного обеспечения предпринимательства: мнения экспертов различных стран // Вопросы управления. 2020. Т. 64, № 3. С. 88–97. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2020-3-88-97
For citation:
Pinkovetskaia Y.S. The level of infrastructure support for entrepreneurship: opinions of experts from various countries // Management Issues. 2020. Vol. 64, no. 3. P. 88–97. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2020-3-88-97
How to Cite
Pinkovetskaia Y.S. The level of infrastructure support for entrepreneurship: opinions of experts from various countries // Management Issues. 2020. Vol. 64, no. 3. P. 88–97. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2020-3-88-97
References
- De Carolis D.M., Saparito P. Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: a theoretical framework // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2006. № 1. Pp. 41-56.
- Decker R., Haltiwanger J., Jarmin R., Miranda J. The Role of Entrepreneurship in US Job Creation and Economic Dynamism // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2014. № 28 (3). Pp. 3-24.
- Simon-Moya V., Revuelto-Taboada L., Ribeiro-Soriano D. Influence of economic crisis on new SME survival: reality or fiction? // Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 2016. № 28 (1-2). Pp. 157-176.
- Sung T.K. Knowledge and technology transfer in technoparks development // International Journal of Technology Policy and Management. 2002. № 2 (3). Pp. 240-259.
- Günsel A. Research on Effectiveness of Technology Transfer from a Knowledge Based Perspective // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. № 207. Pp. 777-785.
- Dickerhof M. A Cooperation Model and Demand-Oriented ICT Infrastructure for SME Development and Production Networks in the Field of Microsystem Technology // Svetan Ratchev. Precision Assembly Technologies and Systems. 2010. № 315. Pp. 319-328.
- Robinson S., Stubberud H.A. Business incubators: What services do business owners really use? // International Journal of Entrepreneurship. 2014. № 18. Pp. 29-39.
- InfoDev, Global Good Practice in Incubation Policy Development and Implementation. The World Bank: Washington, DC. 2010.
- Obokoh L, Goldman G. Infrastructure deficiency and the performance of small- and medium-sized enterprises in Nigeria's Liberalised Economy // Acta Commercii - Independent Research Journal in the Management Sciences. 2016. № 1. Pp. 1-10.
- Gäre K., Melin U. SMEs need formative infrastructure for business transformation // Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2011. № 24 (6). Pp. 520-533.
- Calderón C., Servеn L. The Effects of Infrastructure Development on Growth and Income Distribution. Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 270. Central Bank of Chile. 2004.
- Vandenberg P., Chantapacdepong P., Yoshino N. SMEs in Developing Asia New Approaches to Overcoming Market Failures. Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo. 2016.
- Пиньковецкая Ю.С. Малое предпринимательство на рынках совершенной и монополистической конкуренции // Современная конкуренция. № 2 (32). 2012. С. 3-12.
- Kemp R., Mosselman M., Blees J., Maas J. Barriers to Entry. Scales Research Reports H200301. EIM Business and Policy Research. 2003.
- Panayotis K. Regulatory Barriers to Entry in Industrial Sectors. MPRA Paper 27976. University Library of Munich. Germany. 2010.
- Alvarez C., Urbano D., Coduras A., Ruiz-Navarro J. Environmental Conditions and Entrepreneurial Activity: A Regional Comparison in Spain // Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2011. № 18 (1). Pp. 120-140.
- Gaganis C., Pasiouras F., Voulgari F. Culture, business environment and SMEs' profitability: Evidence from European Countries // Economic Modelling. 2018. № 78. Pp. 275-292.
- Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2018-2019. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA). 2019.
- Пиньковецкая Ю.С. Моделирование показателей деятельности малого и среднего предпринимательства в регионах с использованием функции плотности нормального распределения // Проблемы развития территории. 2015. № 6 (80). С. 93-107.
