Government and public administration

METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ASSESSING THE BENEFITS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION DIGITALIZATION FOR CITIZENS

Received: 15.05.2019 Published: 15.05.2019

UDC: 351:004 EDN: KVPREM DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2019-5-51-62

Full text

Abstract

Both in Russia and abroad, the main trend in improving the quality of public administration is its digital transformation. However, neither Russian nor international practice has developed common approaches to assessing the benefits of public administration digitalization for its key beneficiaries citizens. In the absence of such approaches, there are risks of overestimating the positive impact of digital technologies and insufficient consideration of the interests of citizens in the implementation of initiatives for public authorities’ digitalization. This article is intended to fill this gap. The article analyzes the indices of digitalization of public administration used in international practice. Proceeding from international approaches and Russian specifics, the key effects of the public administration digitalization for citizens are justified, including increasing the availability and quality of public and municipal services, ensuring the protection of legal rights and interests of citizens, minimizing the risks associated with digital transformation, increasing civic involvement in public administration, as well as reducing the time and financial costs associated with interaction with the state. To evaluate these effects, performance and efficiency indicators are proposed. The use of the system of indicators proposed in the article will allow for a comprehensive assessment of the benefits of public administration digitalization for citizens and will help to focus the implementation of the Federal project "Digital public administration" to achieve the final socially significant results.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Добролюбова Е.И. Методические подходы к оценке выгод от цифровизации государственного управления для граждан // Вопросы управления. 2019. Т. 60, № 5. С. 51–62. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-5-51-62

For citation:

Dobrolyubova E. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ASSESSING THE BENEFITS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION DIGITALIZATION FOR CITIZENS // Management Issues. 2019. Vol. 60, no. 5. P. 51–62. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-5-51-62

How to Cite

Dobrolyubova E. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ASSESSING THE BENEFITS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION DIGITALIZATION FOR CITIZENS // Management Issues. 2019. Vol. 60, no. 5. P. 51–62. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-5-51-62

References

  1. World Bank: Digital Dividends. World Development Report (2016). [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/896971468194972881/pdf/102725-PUB-Replacement-PUBLIC.pdf (дата обращения 12.04.2019)
  2. ООН. Исследование ООН: электронное правительство 2018. Организация объединенных наций. Нью-Йорк, 2018.
  3. World Economic Forum. Global Information Technology Report 2016. [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://reports.weforum.org/global-information-technology-report-2016/economies/#indexId=NRI&economy=RUS (дата обращения 12.04.2019)
  4. ICT Development Index 2017. [электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/idi/2017/index.html (дата обращения 12.04.2019).
  5. ITU. Global Cybersecurity Index 2018. [электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Cybersecurity/Documents/draft-18-00706_Global-Cybersecurity-Index-EV5_print_2.pdf (дата обращения 12.04.2019).
  6. The 14th Waseda - IAC International Digital Government Rankings 2018 Report. [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://iacio.org/iacio2018/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/The_2018_Waseda-IAC_Digital_Government_Rankings_Report-2.pdf#page=85&zoom=100,0,96 (дата обращения 12.04.2019)
  7. Máchová R., Lněnička M. Reframing. E-Government Development Indices with Respect to New Trends in ICT // Review of Economic Perspectives - Národohospodářský Obzor. 2015. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 383-411.
  8. Сидоренко Э. Л., Барциц И. Н., Хисамова З. И. Эффективность цифрового государственного управления: теоретические и прикладные аспекты // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2019. № 2. С. 93-114
  9. Камолов С.Г. Государственное управление в цифровую эпоху. [электронный ресурс]. URL: https://mgimo.ru/upload/iblock/56b/KamolovSG_Article.pdf (дата обращения 12.04.2019)
  10. Welby B. The impact of digital government on citizen wellbeing. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance. 2019. No. 32.
  11. Южаков В.Н., Добролюбова Е.И., Покида А.Н., Зыбуновская Н.В. Удовлетворенность граждан качеством административных государственных и муниципальных услуг: результаты мониторинга 2014 года. М., "Дело". 2015.
  12. Южаков В.Н., Добролюбова Е.И., Покида А.Н., Зыбуновская Н.В. Реформа контрольно-надзорной деятельности государства: оценка с позиции граждан // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2019. № 2. С. 71-92.
  13. Добролюбова Е.И., Южаков В.Н., Ефремов А.А., Клочкова Е.Н., Талапина Э.В., Старцев Я.Ю. Цифровое будущее государственного управления по результатам. М., "Дело". 2019.
  14. Lafortune G., Ubaldi B. OURdata Index: Methodology and results // OECD Working Papers on Public Governance. 2017. No. 30