Government and public administration
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES IN TERMS OF AUTOPOIESIS
Received: 15.06.2018 Published: 15.06.2018
UDC: 316.354 EDN: VRYVZZ DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2018-6-84-90
Full text
Abstract
Purpose. To analyse some provisions of the theory of autopoiesis, developed by the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann, in projection to the organizational changes of modern business companies. Methods. In the process of research, we used such methods as the system approach, the method of analysis and synthesis, the comparative method, the structural method, and the method of formal logic. Results. Through the prism of the theory of autopoiesis by Niklas Luhman, the authors examined informal relationships and practices in the labor collectives of modern business companies. Thus, informal groups in enterprises are autopoietic systems that define themselves independently and exclude external factors and the environment. Internal relations are highlighted and diagnosed in the context of environmental influences. It considers various, including non-formalized, practices that have developed within a business organization. With the help of the concept of autopoiesis, many organizational changes taking place in business organizations, regardless of the will and consciousness of management, are explained... Purpose. To analyse some provisions of the theory of autopoiesis, developed by the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann, in projection to the organizational changes of modern business companies. Methods. In the process of research, we used such methods as the system approach, the method of analysis and synthesis, the comparative method, the structural method, and the method of formal logic. Results. Through the prism of the theory of autopoiesis by Niklas Luhman, the authors examined informal relationships and practices in the labor collectives of modern business companies. Thus, informal groups in enterprises are autopoietic systems that define themselves independently and exclude external factors and the environment. Internal relations are highlighted and diagnosed in the context of environmental influences. It considers various, including non-formalized, practices that have developed within a business organization. With the help of the concept of autopoiesis, many organizational changes taking place in business organizations, regardless of the will and consciousness of management, are explained. These changes are viewed through the prism of communications and distribution of power. There are also touched upon other plots of the emergence and development of organizational relations within the labor collectives of modern organizations as the communication of relations of power and language (in the sociolinguistic aspect). Speaking about the dependence of autopoiesis and efficiency, style, methods of management influence in companies (top management), the authors came to the conclusion that we are dealing with the issue of self-reference self-management development of the system of informal relations in the company. Scientific novelty. The authors investigated some provisions of Luhmann’s autopoiesis theory and proved that it can be used to study consciousness, society, and the phenomenon of life in general, and in cases of specific situations to consider informal practices in the workforce of modern business companies. function show_eabstract() { $('#eabstract1').hide(); $('#eabstract2').show(); $('#eabstract_expand').hide(); } ▼Показать полностью
Keywords
How to cite
Для цитирования:
Бекарев А., Тюрина Н. Организационные изменения в терминах автопоэзиса // Вопросы управления. 2018. Т. 36, № 6. С. 84–90. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2018-6-84-90
For citation:
Bekarev A., Tyurina N. ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES IN TERMS OF AUTOPOIESIS // Management Issues. 2018. Vol. 36, no. 6. P. 84–90. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2018-6-84-90
How to Cite
Bekarev A., Tyurina N. ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES IN TERMS OF AUTOPOIESIS // Management Issues. 2018. Vol. 36, no. 6. P. 84–90. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2018-6-84-90
References
- Деминг У. Э. Выход из кризиса: Новая парадигма управления людьми, системами и процессами. М.: Альпина Паблишер, 2012. 419 с.
- Антоновский А.Ю. Никлас Луман: эпистемологическое введение в теорию социальных систем. М.: ИФРАН, 2007. 135 c.
- Луман Н. Общество как социальная система. [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://yanko.lib.ru/books/cultur/luman-ob_kak_soc-sistema-8l.pdf (дата обращения 14.02.2018)
- Филиппов А.Ф. Теория систем: аутопойесис продолжается // Социологическое обозрение. 2003. Т.3. № 1. с. 50-58
- Висковатофф А. Основания теории социальных систем Никласа Лумана // Социология. 2002. №2. с. 38-42
- Луман Н. Почему необходима «системная теория»? [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/2971 (дата обращения 14.02.2018)
- Луман Н. Понятие общества. [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/2969 (дата обращения: 14.02.2018)
- Луман Н. Власть. [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/3618 (дата обращения: 14.02.2018)
- Вебер М. О некоторых категориях понимающей социологии. М.: Прогресс,1990. 1042 с.
- Бекарев А. М., Пак Г. С. // Личность. Культура. Общества. Т. 13. 2011. №63-64. С. 120-127.
- Бауман З. Текучая современность. СПб.: Питер, 2008. 240 с.
