Government and public administration
ENSURING OF QUALITY LEVEL OF BRANCH UNIVERSITY TEACHERS
Received: 15.05.2017 Published: 15.05.2017
UDC: 338:378 EDN: XTUEFV
Full text
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to work out theoretical and methodical provisions concerning the career development assessment (CDA) of branch university teachers for ensuring their staff strength. The article presents up-to-date techniques of managerial analysis: factions, comparisons, relative value calculation, expert assessment, surveys. The results and application area: there has been conducted complex assessment of importance ranking of career development quality elements and teachers’ satisfaction with them. Research results can be used for working out recommendations on career development quality improvement as the basis of staff framing. The novelty of the materials presented in the article consists in working out the complex of assessment coefficients of teachers’ career development quality elements; and in application of the assessment results as the instrument in modeling managerial activity. Interaction of organizations and universities is characterized by specific nature. Uniqueness of the places of getting education implies responsible attitude to the teachers’ staff of branch universities. There have been explored the places of transport universities in various ratings and the teachers’ role in their forming. To sustain high standard of professional and teaching staff ensuring the state of railway branch cadre it is necessary to implement monitoring of their quality state and activity effectiveness. The important factor consolidating and securing teachers’ position at university is their satisfaction with career development quality. On the basis of surveying young teachers there have been determined important coefficients of career development quality. Special attention has been paid to the results of young teachers’ surveying, there have been revealed conditions that do not satisfy this contingent.
Keywords
How to cite
Для цитирования:
Калганова Н., Паршина В. Обеспечение качественного уровня преподавателей отраслевого уровня // Вопросы управления. 2017. Т. 48, № 5. С. 132–138.
For citation:
Kalganova N., Parshina V. ENSURING OF QUALITY LEVEL OF BRANCH UNIVERSITY TEACHERS // Management Issues. 2017. Vol. 48, no. 5. P. 132–138.
How to Cite
Kalganova N., Parshina V. ENSURING OF QUALITY LEVEL OF BRANCH UNIVERSITY TEACHERS // Management Issues. 2017. Vol. 48, no. 5. P. 132–138.
References
- Горелов Н. А. Энциклопедия труда и занятости. СПб: Изд-во Санкт-Петербурского гос. ун-та, 1997. 187 с.
- Зонова О.В. Качество трудовой жизни: определение и критерии оценки//Проблемы современной экономики. 2010. № 3 (35). С. 79.
- Бойкова Е.Б. Концепция качества трудовой жизни и теория КТЖ как ее дальнейшее развитие и конкретизация//Экономика труда и управление персоналом: межвузовский сборник. СПб: Изд-во СПб ГУЭФ, 1998. С. 96.
- Жулина Е.Г. Основы мотивации работодателей к развитию качества трудовой жизни в организации. . URL: http://www.teoria -practica.ru/-1 -2011/economika/zhulina.pdf. (дата обращения 03.11.2017 г.)
- Кибанов А.Я. Управление персоналом организации. Пратикум: Учеб. пособие/Под ред. А.Я. Кибанова. М.: Инфра-М, 2012. 200 с.
- Егоршин А.П. Мотивация трудовой деятельности: учеб. пособие. М.: Инфра-М, 2010. 464 с.
- Калганова Н.В., Паршина В.С. Формирование показателей оценки качества трудовой жизни преподавателей вуза/Качество и полезность в экономической теории и практике: материалы VIII Всеросс. заочной научн.-практ. конф. 30 ноября 2016. Новосибирск: НГУЭУ, 2016. 268 с.
- Калганова Н.В., Паршина В.С. Результаты оценки преподавателями вуза качества трудовой жизни: в сб.: «Наука в XXI веке: инновационный потенциал развития». Уфа, 2017. 82 с.
- Генкин Б.М. Экономика и социология труда: учебник для вузов -М.: Норма, 2003. С. 33.
