Government and public administration

THE DICHOTOMY OF MARKET AND EMBEDDED SOCIAL RELATIONS AS A FACTOR OF FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CLUSTER-NETWORK ORGANIZATIONS

Received: 15.05.2016 Published: 15.05.2016

UDC: 332.1(1-3) EDN: ZERNCD

Full text

Abstract

Purpose. Identification of specific features affecting the market (free) and embedded social relations on the formation and development of the explicit and latent cluster-network organizations in the regional economy. Methods. To justify the hypotheses, provided in the article, a detailed analysis of the published Russian and foreign research and literature sources has been carried out. The review of the literature on this topic allowed formulating conclusions about the significance of the embedded and market relations in the formation and development of cluster-network organizations in the regional economy. Results. The regularities of the integration effects growth in the regional economy connected with the dominance of embedded or market social relations are revealed. The degree of influence of the social embeddedness of relations between firms located in the same region on their economic growth is identified. Scientific novelty. A new form of organization “cluster-network organization” is proposed. Social relations referring to the factors of the cluster-network organizations formation are classified. An approach to identify the cluster-network organizations, including the sociological, cultural and historical research methods is provided. The degree of influence of the embedded and market social relations on the cluster-network organization formation is revealed.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Чупров К. Дихотомия рыночных и укорененных социальных связей как фактор образования и развития кластерно-сетевых организаций // Вопросы управления. 2016. Т. 42, № 5. С. 150–160.

For citation:

Chuprov K. THE DICHOTOMY OF MARKET AND EMBEDDED SOCIAL RELATIONS AS A FACTOR OF FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CLUSTER-NETWORK ORGANIZATIONS // Management Issues. 2016. Vol. 42, no. 5. P. 150–160.

How to Cite

Chuprov K. THE DICHOTOMY OF MARKET AND EMBEDDED SOCIAL RELATIONS AS A FACTOR OF FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CLUSTER-NETWORK ORGANIZATIONS // Management Issues. 2016. Vol. 42, no. 5. P. 150–160.

References

  1. Baker W.E. Market networks and corporate behavior // Am. J. Sociol., 1990. № 96. Pp. 589-625.
  2. Baum J.A.C, Oliver C. Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations // Am. Sociol. Rev. 1992. № 57.Рр. 540-559.
  3. Cohen W.M, Levinthal DA. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D // Econ.J. 1989. № 99. Рр. 569-596.
  4. Cohen W.M, Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation // Admin. Sci. 1990. № 35. Рр. 128-152.
  5. Dore R. Goodwill and the spirit of market capitalism // Br. J. Sociol. 1983. № 34. Рр. 459-482.
  6. Doz Y.L. The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: initial conditions or learning processes? // Strat. Manage. J. 1996. № 17. Рр. 55-83.
  7. Fine C., G. Gilboy K. Parker Oye and G. Technology supply chains: an introductory essay // Working Draft by the International Motor Vehicle Program at MIT Sloan School of Management. Cambridge, 1995.
  8. Gertler M.S. (), "Being there": proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies // Economic Geography. 1995. № 71. Рр. 1-26.
  9. Hamel G. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances // Strat. Manage. J. 1991. № 12. Рр. 83-103.
  10. Lam A. The social embeddedness of knowledge: problems of knowledge sharing and organization learning in international high-technology ventures // DRUID Working Paper. 1998. № 98-7.
  11. Locke R.M. Remaking the Italian economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.
  12. Markusen A.R., Lee Y.S. and DiGiovanna S. (eds) Second-tier cities: rapid growth beyond the metropolis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
  13. Parkhe A. Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances // J. Int. Bus. Stud. 1991. № 22 Рр. 579-601.
  14. Perrow C. Small firm networks // Explorations in Economic Sociology / Edited by R Swedberg. New York: Russell Sage Found, 1993. Pp. 277-402.
  15. Pfeffer J., Nowak P. Joint-ventures and interorganizational interdependence // Admin.Sci. 1976. № 21ю Рр. 398-418.
  16. Podolny J.M., Page K.L. Network forms of organization // Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1998. № 24. Рр. 57-76.
  17. Polenske Karen R. Clustering in Space Versus Dispersing Over Space: Handbook of Research on Cluster Theory / Edited by C. Karlsson. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2008.
  18. Powell W.W. Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization // Research in Organizational Behavior / Edited by B. Staw, L.L. Cummings. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1990. Pp. 295-336.
  19. Powell W.W., Brantley P. Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: learning through networks? // Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action/ Edited by N Nohria, R Eccles. Boston: Harvard Bus. Sch., 1992. Pp. 366-394.
  20. Stark D. Recombinant property in East European capitalism // Am. J. Sociol. 1996. № 101. Рр. 993-1027.
  21. Stuart T.E., Hoang H., Hybels R. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Chicago, 1997.
  22. Грановеттер М. Сила слабых связей//Экономическая социология. 2009. Т.10. № 4. С. 31-50.
  23. Могилевский В.Д. Методология систем: вербальный подход. М.: Экономика, 1999. 251 c.
  24. Теория организации: Учебник / Б.З. Мильнер. 8-e изд., перераб. и доп. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2012. 848 с.
  25. Уцци Б. Источники и последствия укорененности для экономической эффективности организаций: влияние сетей // Анализ рынков в современной экономической социологии. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2008, С. 208-252.