Government and public administration

MECHANISMS OF URBAN COMMUNITIES INTERACTION IN THE SMART CITY DEVELOPMENT (BY THE EXAMPLE OF OMSK CITY)

Received: 15.06.2019 Published: 15.06.2019

UDC: 316.334.56 EDN: GPJXSF DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2019-6-272-280

Full text

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the mechanisms of interaction of urban communities in the formation of Smart City by assessing the level of development of internal urban subsystems on a territorial basis, taking into account the processes of segregation. The study is based on the analysis of scientific discourse about Smart City, institutional analysis of the legal framework for the development of “smart cities” in the Russian Federation, as well as data from an expert survey of representatives of territorial public self-government committees in Omsk city. Having studied the world experience of building “smart cities”, the author noted the priority importance of the internal environment in the development of the city, which includes social and institutional foundations for generating and implementing innovations. The problems that arise because of the low readiness of urban communities for Smart City technology solutions are noted, including the hypothesis of the impact of digitalization on the strengthening of spatial segregation. Based on the materials of Omsk city, a classification of the mechanisms of interaction of urban communities in the formation of Smart City was developed. It is determined that in the city of Omsk there is a significant segregation of the territory according to the level of development of elements of the urban environment. The scientific novelty consists in identifying additional grounds for segregation of the urban environment based on the dichotomy of the concepts of “digital city” and “smart city”. The study was supported by the RFBR (project 18-311-00210 “Sociolinguistic analysis of urbanistic discourse of urban communities (by the example of Omsk city)”).

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Капогузов Е., Оводова С., Чупин Р. Механизмы взаимодействия городских сообществ при формировании smart-city (на примере города Омска) // Вопросы управления. 2019. Т. 61, № 6. С. 272–280. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-6-272-280

For citation:

Kapoguzov E., Ovodova S., Chupin R. MECHANISMS OF URBAN COMMUNITIES INTERACTION IN THE SMART CITY DEVELOPMENT (BY THE EXAMPLE OF OMSK CITY) // Management Issues. 2019. Vol. 61, no. 6. P. 272–280. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-6-272-280

How to Cite

Kapoguzov E., Ovodova S., Chupin R. MECHANISMS OF URBAN COMMUNITIES INTERACTION IN THE SMART CITY DEVELOPMENT (BY THE EXAMPLE OF OMSK CITY) // Management Issues. 2019. Vol. 61, no. 6. P. 272–280. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-6-272-280

References

  1. Оводова С.Н., Чупин Р.И., Жигунов А.Ю. Урбанистический дискурс о благоустройстве города в городе: от нарративов к институтам // Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований). 2018. Т. 10. №. 3. С. 123-138.
  2. Romão J., Kourtit K., Neuts B., Nijkamp P. The smart city as a common place for tourists and residents: A structural analysis of the determinants of urban attractiveness // Cities. 2018. Vol. 78. P. 67-75.
  3. Lombardi P., Giordano S., Farouh H., Yousef W. Modelling the smart city performance // The European Journal of Social Science Research. 2012. Vol. 25. №. 2. P. 137-149.
  4. Letaifa S.B. How to strategize smart cities: Revealing the SMART model // Journal of Business Research. 2015. Vol. 68. №. 7. P. 1414-1419.
  5. Курбатова М.В., Каган Е.С., Вшивкова А. А. Региональное развитие: проблемы формирования и реализации научно-технического потенциала // Terra Economicus. 2018. Т. 16. №. 1. С. 101-117.
  6. Granier B., Kudo H. How are citizens involved in smart cities? Analysing citizen participation in Japanese "Smart Communities" // Information Polity. 2016. Vol. 21. №. 1. P. 61-76.
  7. Batty M. Big data, smart cities and city planning // Dialogues in Human Geography. 2013. Vol. 3. №. 3. P. 274-279.
  8. Капогузов Е.А., Ковеченкова А.А. Инициативное бюджетирование - от практик к институционализации? (случай г. Омска) // ЭКО. 2018. Т. 48. № 9. С. 39-50.
  9. Kummitha Rama K.R., Crutzen N. How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective // Cities. 2017. Vol. 67. P. 43-52.
  10. Hollands R.G. Critical interventions into the corporate smart city // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2015. Vol. 8. № 1. P. 61-77.
  11. Jucevičius R., Patašienė I., Patašius M. Digital dimension of smart city: critical analysis // Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014. Vol. 156. P. 146-150.
  12. Jucevicius R., Liugailaite-Radzvickiene L. Smart development: a conceptual framework // The Proceedings of The 10th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organisational Learning, ICICKM-2013. 2013. P. 212-219.
  13. Bibri S.E., Krogstie J. On the social shaping dimensions of smart sustainable cities: A study in science, technology, and society // Sustainable Cities and Society. 2017. Vol. 29. P. 219-246.
  14. Marvin S., Luque-Ayala A., McFarlane C. Smart urbanism: Utopian vision or false dawn? Routledge, 2015.
  15. Sunstein C.R. Nudging and choice architecture: Ethical considerations // Yale Journal on Regulation, Forthcoming. 2015.