Government and public administration

PRACTICES OF SOCIAL PARTNERSHIP IN STATE AND NON-STATE SECTORS OF EMPLOYMENT IN MODERN RUSSIA

Received: 15.06.2018 Published: 15.06.2018

UDC: 316.334.22(470) EDN: YUNOBF DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2018-6-117-127

Full text

Abstract

Subject, purpose. The subject of the article is comparative empirical study of practices of social partnership in state and non-state sectors of employment in modern Russia. The purpose of the article is to present the practices of social partnership and factors of its realization in organizations of state and non-state employment sectors. Methods. We select two organizations as the research field. The first organization is budget, labour relations there are formalized and strongly regulated by government. The second organization is private, most sides of labour relations are informal, government does not interfere in regulation of labour relations. The research consists of questionnaires, depth interviews and included observation. Results. It was revealed that social partnership is not always institutional phenomenon, it can be manifested in certain practices of interaction between employees and employer in organization. Four models of these practices were studied ─ model of corporate solidarity, model of group solidarity, model of individual business partnership and model of conflict confrontation... Subject, purpose. The subject of the article is comparative empirical study of practices of social partnership in state and non-state sectors of employment in modern Russia. The purpose of the article is to present the practices of social partnership and factors of its realization in organizations of state and non-state employment sectors. Methods. We select two organizations as the research field. The first organization is budget, labour relations there are formalized and strongly regulated by government. The second organization is private, most sides of labour relations are informal, government does not interfere in regulation of labour relations. The research consists of questionnaires, depth interviews and included observation. Results. It was revealed that social partnership is not always institutional phenomenon, it can be manifested in certain practices of interaction between employees and employer in organization. Four models of these practices were studied ─ model of corporate solidarity, model of group solidarity, model of individual business partnership and model of conflict confrontation. Results of research confirm the author’s hypothesis that the practices of social partnership in budget sector of employment correspond to model of group solidarity, while in private sector of employment ─ to model of individual business partnership. Scientific novelty. A model of group solidarity as an addition to the classification of non-institutional models of social partnership is proposed; models of social partnership in organizations of state and non-state employment sectors of modern Russia are identified on the basis of empirical referents of social partnership that are singled out by the author. function show_eabstract() { $('#eabstract1').hide(); $('#eabstract2').show(); $('#eabstract_expand').hide(); } ▼Показать полностью

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Сорокин Н. Практики социального партнерства в государственном и негосударственном секторах занятости современной России // Вопросы управления. 2018. Т. 36, № 6. С. 117–127. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2018-6-117-127

For citation:

Sorokin N. PRACTICES OF SOCIAL PARTNERSHIP IN STATE AND NON-STATE SECTORS OF EMPLOYMENT IN MODERN RUSSIA // Management Issues. 2018. Vol. 36, no. 6. P. 117–127. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2018-6-117-127

How to Cite

Sorokin N. PRACTICES OF SOCIAL PARTNERSHIP IN STATE AND NON-STATE SECTORS OF EMPLOYMENT IN MODERN RUSSIA // Management Issues. 2018. Vol. 36, no. 6. P. 117–127. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2018-6-117-127

References

  1. Бочаров В.Ю., Тукумцев Б.Г. Социальное партнерство на промышленных предприятиях // Петербургская социология сегодня. 2015. № 6. C. 10-63.
  2. Иванов О.И. Социальное партнерство: некоторые вопросы теории. СПб.: РАН, 1994.
  3. Малышев М.А. Партнерство в системе социально-трудовых отношений: автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени доктора экономических наук. М., 2008.
  4. Милецкий В.П., Казаринова Н.В. Системное содержание современной социальной политики. СПб.: ЛЭТИ, 2010.
  5. Михеев В.А. Основы социального партнерства: теория и политика. М.: Экзамен, 2001.
  6. Петров А.В. Социология профсоюзного движения. СПб.: Изд. дом СПбГУ, 2008.
  7. Поляков В.И. Социальное партнерство на предприятии. Индикаторы состояния и поиск путей реализации // Вестник РАЕН. 2014. № 3. С. 65-69.
  8. Сорокин Н.С. Социальное партнерство как принцип социальной политики в области трудовых отношений: региональные особенности // Труд и социальные отношения. 2016. № 4. С. 116-130.
  9. Ebisui M. Non-standard Workers: Good Practices of Social Dialogue and Collective Bargaining // E- Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies. 2012. V. 1. № 3-4. P. 211-246.
  10. Lansbury Russell D. Trade Unions, Vocational Education and Workplace Training: International Trends // E- Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies. 2015. V. 4. № 2. P. 1-25.
  11. Teague P. Social Partnership and the Enterprise: Some Lessons From the Irish Experience // European Political Economy Review. 2004. № 1. P. 6-35.
  12. Бизюков П.В. Практики регулирования трудовых отношений в условиях неустойчивой занятости. М.: Центр социально-трудовых прав, 2013.
  13. Бляхер Л.Е. Чего боятся и как выживают бюджетники (по материалам эмпирического исследования) // Полития. 2016. № 3. С. 52-70.
  14. Бочаров В.Ю. Роль российских профсоюзов в модернизации института наемного труда // Вестник СПбГУ. Социология. 2017. № 1. С. 4-22.
  15. Bezrukova О., Samoylova V. The Rights of Working Mothers and Social Support of the Young Family in Russia // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2015. № 5. С. 27-44.
  16. Менкенов А.В. К вопросу об альтернативной подсудности по искам о восстановлении трудовых прав // Вопросы управления. 2017. № 1. С. 212-215.
  17. Темницкий А.Л. Предпосылки выращивания институтов партнерства в сфере трудовых отношений: концептуальные модели и эмпирическая проверка / Модернизация экономики и выращивание институтов, 2005. С. 104-114.
  18. Темницкий А.Л. Условия формирования партнерски ориентированных работников на российских промышленных предприятиях: статья в открытом архиве. № 1816. Институт социологии РАН, 2010. 23 с. [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.isras.ru/files/File/Publication/Novye_publikazii/Soc_partnerstvo_Temnitsky.pdf (дата обращения 17.09.2018).
  19. Безрукова О.Н., Самойлова В.А. Отцовский отпуск в России: мечты или реальность? // Социологические исследования. 2017. № 7. С. 116-125.