Government and public administration

The role of CSR in the formation of social-labor relations in modern organizations

Received: 15.01.2016 Published: 15.01.2016

UDC: 316.334.2 EDN: WMKAKF

Full text

Abstract

Purpose. To study the impact of CSR activities in the internal and external environment of organizations on the state of corporate labor resources and socio-economic performance. Methods. A social questionnaire survey is conducted and methods of economic analysis are used, namely: grouping, comparison, survey, etc. Results. Proceeding from the analysis of globally existing CSR models the authors provide their own assessment of the Russian CSR model specifics which are justified by our country’s heritage since the times of the administrative-command system of management and spontaneously-evolving market practice in the 1990-s. Having analyzed the sociological survey the authors draw the conclusion of the priority directions of CSR programs towards internal issues and corporate interests and also the interrelations of economic and social functions of an enterprise to achieve the efficient work of the personnel in terms of content, conditions and results. Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty lies in researching the impact of CSR programs in the internal and external environment of the organization on significance and efficiency of the implemented programs for the specific groups of stakeholders.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Витик С., Риттер И. Роль КСО в формировании социально-трудовых отношений современной организации // Вопросы управления. 2016. Т. 19, № 1. С. 177–181.

For citation:

Vitik S., Ritter I. The role of CSR in the formation of social-labor relations in modern organizations // Management Issues. 2016. Vol. 19, no. 1. P. 177–181.

How to Cite

Vitik S., Ritter I. The role of CSR in the formation of social-labor relations in modern organizations // Management Issues. 2016. Vol. 19, no. 1. P. 177–181.

References

  1. Друкер П.Ф. Эффективное управление. М.: ГРАНД, 2001, 312 с.
  2. Heal G. Corporate social responsibility: An economic and financial framework//Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice. 2005. № 30 (3). Pp. 387-409.
  3. Глущенко Е.В., Захарова Е.В., Тихонравов Ю.В. Теория управления. М.: Вестник, 1996.
  4. Bird R., Casavecchia L., Reggiani F. Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: Where to begin? Milan: Working Paper, 2006.
  5. Kang K.H., Lee S., Huh C. Impacts of positive and negative corporate social responsibility activities on company performance in the hospitality industry//International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2010. № 29 (1). Pp. 72-82.
  6. Emerson J. The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns//California Management Review. 2003. № 45 (4). Pp. 35-51.
  7. Экономика и социология труда/Под ред. А.Я. Кибанова. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2009, 584 с.
  8. Юрьева Т.В. Социальная рыночная экономика. М.: Русская Деловая Литература, 1999, 416 с.
  9. Витик С.В. Стимулирование репродуктивного труда на российских предприятиях механизм и оценка эффективности: диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата экономических наук. Екатеринбург, 2012.
  10. Коптякова С.В., Балынская Н.Р., Витик С.В., Риттер И.В. Управление персоналом предприятия на основе механизмов стимулирования репродуктивного труда. Санкт-Петербург, 2014.