Coordination as an effective method of public administration in Europe (on the example of Iceland)

Abstract

Subject. The subject of the work are the problems of using the coordination mechanisms in the law of Iceland. Purpose. Goal of this study was to determine the existence, extent, relevance of legal mechanisms of law coordination in Icelandic legislation. Methods. When writing the work the author used the method of comparative law; applied the methods and techniques of formal logic, system approach. Results. The result of the study is to establish quality coordination rules in Iceland. The results can be useful to improve the Russian legislation in similar spheres through changes in the coordination rules. The study came to the following conclusions: unexpected areas of social life are often exposed to coordination, that is not true for other countries and could be used by the Russian legislator; application of the coordination rules communicates directly with the efficiency of the State and law; according to a legislator of Iceland, coordination is a significant tool for managing society; in application of coordination mechanisms in the law of the Republic of Iceland, there are also drawbacks, which must avoided by a Russian lawmaker, such as the lack of a clear doctrine applying coordination of norms and explicit failure coordinating regulation in criminal law and criminal process. Scientific novelty. For the first time the author applied the coordination approach to consideration of legal phenomena, through which you can explore the legal phenomenon from a new angle. This gives an opportunity to increase the effectiveness of legal activity. Normally coordinating rules of law are not the subject of a separate study. This study is carried out by the author for the first time on the example of Iceland law, using a wide range of legal materials.