Government and public administration

"Ukrainian issue" in the post-revolutionary emigrant historiography

Received: 15.04.2015 Published: 15.04.2015

UDC: 94(477) EDN: VODDMB

Full text

Abstract

Purpose. The article analyzes the scientific literature, created by historians emigrants of 1920-1930 and on the legal basis of Ukraine's joining to Russia, as well as the problem of formation of serfdom in the Ukraine. Methods. Based on the principles of the system approach, the author uses the methods of comparative-historical and critical analysis. Results and scientific innovation. The author discusses the Ukrainian statehood on the basis of Ukrainian study researches historians, considered aspects of the formation and self-determination of the Ukrainian people.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Цепилова В. «Украинский вопрос» в пореволюционной эмигрантской историографии // Вопросы управления. 2015. Т. 16, № 4. С. 20–24.

For citation:

Tsepilova V. "Ukrainian issue" in the post-revolutionary emigrant historiography // Management Issues. 2015. Vol. 16, no. 4. P. 20–24.

How to Cite

Tsepilova V. "Ukrainian issue" in the post-revolutionary emigrant historiography // Management Issues. 2015. Vol. 16, no. 4. P. 20–24.

References

  1. Сватиков С.Г. Россия и Дон. 1549-1917 г.г. Издание донской исторической комиссии. 1924. 592 с.
  2. Кизеветтер А.А. Рец.: С.Г. Сватиков. Россия и Дон. 1549-1917 г.г. Издание донской исторической комиссии. 1924. // Современные записки. 1925. Т.23. С. 493-495.
  3. Мякотин В.А. Очерки социальной истории Украины в XVIII-XVIII в.в. Вып.1. Прага, 1924. 263 с.; Вып. 2. Прага, 1925. 217 с.; Вып.3. Прага, 1926. 220 с.
  4. Одинец Д.М. Рец.: Мякотин В.А. Очерки социальной истории Украины в XVIII-XVIII в.в. Прага, 1926. Т.1. 263 с., Т.2. 217 с. // Современные записки. 1926. Т. 26. С. 515-518.
  5. Бицилли П.М. Наследие империи // Современные записки. 1927. Т.32. С. 311-325.