BLOCKCHAIN IN PROPERTY RIGHTS AS A STATE INSTITUTIONS TRUST STRENGTHENING FCTOR
PDF (Russian)
XML (Russian)

Supplementary Files

Список источников (Russian)
References

Keywords

Blockchain, institutional trust, government institutions, property rights, real estate, financial assets, intellectual property, digital transformation, digital infrastructure

How to Cite

BLOCKCHAIN IN PROPERTY RIGHTS AS A STATE INSTITUTIONS TRUST STRENGTHENING FCTOR. (2025). Management Issues, 19(4), 139-156. https://voprosy-upravleniya.owebs.ru/article/view/1289

Abstract

Introduction. In the context of digital transformation, the task of strengthening trust in government institutions acquires a new dimension. The author examines the problem of building institutional trust in the field of property rights. By analyzing the role of blockchain in regulating property rights in real estate, financial assets, and intellectual property, the author seeks to demonstrate how digital registries influence the level of trust in state institutions.

Materials and methods. The methodology is based on theoretical-legal, political science, institutional, and structural-functional analyses of digital institutions. The study employs descriptive analysis, comparative analysis of international cases (Propy, ChromaWay, Stellar, Verisart), the case study method, the historical approach, as well as methods of systematization and interpretation of practical examples of blockchain implementation in the field of property rights.

Results. The analysis of the most promising areas of blockchain application in the field of property rights – real estate, financial assets, and intellectual property – has made it possible to view blockchain not only as an innovative IT solution, but also as a factor in strengthening institutional trust.  the blockchain-based systems, trust shifts from specific officials to the procedure itself – to the immutability of records, transparency, automation through smart contracts, auditability of operations, and integration with state registries. Institutional trust increases as real estate transactions become more transparent, corruption risks are reduced, registration and re-registration of rights are accelerated, and transactional and administrative costs related to settlements and tokenization are lowered. The verifiability of ownership rights improves, the share of disputed transactions decreases, and the costs of legal recognition of digital records are reduced. Thus, blockchain contributes to the formation of institutional trust based on clearly defined procedures.

Discussion. Digital infrastructure is gradually becoming an independent factor influencing institutional resilience. Further research is needed to analyze the institutional risks associated with the use of blockchain technology, particularly those arising from the legal uncertainty of electronic records, the complexity of personal data protection, and the insufficient coherence of regulatory frameworks.

PDF (Russian)
XML (Russian)

References

Зайцев С. Ю. Деятельность ТНК в политической сфере: современные тенденции и влияние на концепты власти, легитимности и суверенитета // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 25: Международные отношения и мировая политика. 2023. Т. 15, № 2. С. 35–64. DOI 10.48015/2076-7404-2023-15-2-35-64. EDN UVBWLN.

Кротков В. О. «Мягкая сила» в среднеазиатском регионе: общие контуры баланса сил // Ближний и Постсоветский Восток. 2023. № 4 (4). С. 7–17. DOI 10.31249/j.2949-2408.2023.04.01. EDN DSPBGY.

Koelemaij J. The world's number 1 real estate development exporter? Assessing announced transnational projects from the United Arab Emirates between 2003–2014 // Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 2022. Vol. 54. No. 2. P. 430–449. DOI 10.1177/0308518X211054847. EDN XFZYXQ.

Intropi P. Reciprocal Libertarianism // European Journal of Political Theory. 2022. Online first. DOI 10.1177/14748851221099659. EDN MKQUQW.

Савин С. В., Мурзин А. Д. Проблемы развития интеллектуальной собственности и инноваций в России // Интеллект. Инновации. Инвестиции. 2023. № 5. С. 69–81. DOI 10.25198/2077-7175-2023-5-69. EDN MPGEDL.

Rastogi M., Rastogi V., Rajpoot D. S. Intellectual Property Challenges in Cross-border Business Transactions // International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 2024. Vol. 6. Issue 3. DOI 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.22079. EDN YPONVT.

Давыдов А. П. «Власть-собственность» и неравенство в России как социальная проблема // Научный результат. Социология и управление. 2023. Т. 9, № 3. C. 110–122. DOI 10.18413/2408-9338-2023-9-3-0-8. EDN ENSYOY.

Федоров С. И. Гарантии прав собственности как предварительные условия для экономической конкуренции: эмпирическое исследование // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 6. Экономика. 2023. Т. 58, № 5. С. 90–115. DOI 10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-5-5. EDN ZYWPNJ.

Golka P., van der Zwan N., van der Heide A. Financialization and Assetization: Assets as Sites of Financial Power Struggles // Economy and Society. 2024. Vol. 53. No. 1. P. 112–134. DOI 10.1080/03085147.2024.2307783. EDN RXGHIP.

Schmidt H. Intellectual property rights and market definitions under the 2024 Commission Notice // Journal of Antitrust Enforcement. 2025. DOI 10.1093/jaenfo/jnaf014.

Гринева О. А. Информационная перегрузка человека в информационном обществе // Миссия Конфессий. 2022. Т. 11. Ч. 8. С. 193–199. DOI 10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-2-10. EDN JLMROK.

Болотаева О. С. Применение технологии блокчейн в сфере интеллектуальной собственности // Право и государство: теория и практика. 2023. № 6 (222). С. 206–208. DOI 10.47643/1815-1337_2023_6_206. EDN ANTHQC.

Карцхия А. А., Макаренко Г. И. Правовые аспекты современной кибербезопасности и противодействия киберпреступности // Вопросы кибербезопасности. 2023. № 1 (53). С. 58–74. DOI 10.21681/2311-3456-2023-1-58-74. EDN ZAEMII.

Никитин А. В. Международный опыт применения технологии блокчейн в системах регистрации и учета прав на земельные участки. // МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие). 2022. Т. 13. № 2. С. 222–237. DOI 10.18184/2079-4665.2022.13.2.222-237. EDN BYJKWI.

Елисеева К. И. Использование технологии блокчейн для противодействия незаконным финансовым операциям // Вектор научной мысли. 2024. № 1 (6). С. 223–226. DOI 10.58351/2949-2041.2024.6.1.013. EDN XUYWAY.

Мещеряков С. В., Шуршев В. Ф. Применение технологий блокчейн для учета и регистрации земельных участков // Инженерно-строительный вестник Прикаспия. 2023. № 4 (46). С. 112–115. DOI 10.52684/2312-3702-2023-46-4-115-121. EDN CRKZLO.

Exter E., Radosavljevic M. Blockchain Technology in Commercial Real Estate: Developing a Conceptual Design for Smart Contracts // Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2024. Vol. 55. P. 434–458. DOI 10.17705/1CAIS.05517. EDN FLYNFB.

Щербаков А. А. NFT-технологии в сфере инвестиций в недвижимые объекты: временное веяние либо наступившее будущее // Юридический мир. 2024. № 9. С. 37–40. DOI 10.18572/1811-1475-2024-9-37-40. EDN XUJJYS.

Bennett R., Miller T., Pickering M., Kara A. K. Hybrid Approaches for Smart Contracts in Land Administration: Lessons from Three Blockchain Proofs-of-Concept // Land. 2021. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 220. DOI 10.3390/land10020220. EDN XRMDBH.

Almadadha R. Blockchain and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Australian Banks // Frontiers in Blockchain. 2025. Vol. 8. DOI 10.3389/fbloc.2025.1463633.

Маслов А. В., Швандар К. В. Новые международные проекты по использованию цифровых валют центральных банков в трансформации трансграничных расчетов // Финансовый журнал. 2023. Т. 15. № 2. С. 47–58. DOI 10.31107/2075-1990-2023-2-47-58. EDN LVINPJ.

Андрюшин С. А. Токенизация реальных активов: классификация, платформы, приложения, возможности и проблемы развития // Russian Journal of Economics and Law. 2024. 18 (1). С. 88–104. DOI 10.21202/2782-2923.2024.1.88-104. EDN FCAUDV.

Хмелевская А. С., Кукарцева А. Н. Защита интеллектуальной собственности в условиях цифровой трансформации экономики // Экономика и управление инновациями. 2024. № 1 (28). С. 27–38. DOI 10.26730/2587-5574-2024-1-27-38. EDN ZTRHCZ.

Красиков Д. В. Функционирование и использование систем, основанных на технологии распределенного реестра (DLT): проблемы определения применимого права и юрисдикции // Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Серия 4: Государство и право. 2022. № 3. С. 39–50. DOI 10.31249/rgpravo/2022.03.04. EDN IAHWCX.

Aizenberg E. Conflict and salience as drivers of corporate lobbying? An elite survey experiment // Governance. 2023. Vol. 36. No. 2. P. 555–574. DOI 10.1111/gove.12682. EDN ITNZOA.

Zaitsev, S. Yu. (2023). Political implications of the activities of TNCs: Current trends and impact on the concepts of power, legitimacy and sovereignty. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, 15 (2), pp. 35–64. https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2023-15-2-35-64. https://elibrary.ru/uvbwln.

Krotkov, V. O. (2023). «Soft Power» in the Central Asian Region: General Contours of the Balance of Power. Middle & Post-Soviet east, (4), pp. 7–17. https://doi.org/10.31249/j.2949-2408.2023.04.01. https://elibrary.ru/dspbgy.

Koelemaij, J. (2022). The world's number 1 real estate development exporter? Assessing announced transnational projects from the United Arab Emirates between 2003–2014. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54 (2), pp. 430–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211054847. https://elibrary.ru/xfzyxq.

Intropi, P. (2022). Reciprocal Libertarianism. European Journal of Political Theory, online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851221099659. https://elibrary.ru/mkquqw.

Savin, S. V., Murzin, A. D. (2023). Problems of development of intellectual property and innovations in Russia. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii [Intellect. Innovations. Investments], (5), pp. 69–81. https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2023-5-69. https://elibrary.ru/mpgedl.

Rastogi, M., Rastogi, V., Rajpoot, D. S. (2024). Intellectual Property Challenges in Cross-border Business Transactions. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6 (3). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.22079. https://elibrary.ru/yponvt.

Davydov, A. P. (2023). «Power-Property» and Inequality in Russia as a Social Problem. Research Result. Sociology and management, 9 (3), pp. 35–62. https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2023-9-3-0-8. https://elibrary.ru/ensyoy.

Fedorov, S. I. (2023). Property Rights Guarantees as Preconditions for Economic Competition: An Empirical Study. Lomonosov Economics Journal, 58 (5), pp. 90–115. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-5-5. https://elibrary.ru/zywpnj.

Golka, P., van der Zwan, N., van der Heide, A. (2024). Financialization and Assetization: Assets as Sites of Financial Power Struggles. Economy and Society, 53 (1), pp. 112–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2307783. https://elibrary.ru/rxghip.

Schmidt, H. (2025). Intellectual property rights and market definitions under the 2024 Commission Notice. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnaf014.

Grineva, O. A. (2022). Human information overload in the information society. Mission confessions, 11 (8), pp. 193–199. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-2-10. https://elibrary.ru/jlmrok.

Bolotaeva, O. S. (2023). Application of Blockchain Technology in the Field of Intellectual Property. Law and State: Theory and Practice, (6), pp. 206–208. https://doi.org/10.47643/1815-1337_2023_6_206. https://elibrary.ru/anthqc.

Karckhiya, A. A., Makarenko, G. I. (2023). Legal Aspects of Modern Cybersecurity and Countering Cybercrime. Voprosy kiberbezopasnosti, (1), pp. 58–74. https://doi.org/10.21681/2311-3456-2023-1-58-74. https://elibrary.ru/zaemii.

Nikitin, A. V. (2022). International practice of the blockchain technology usage in recording and registration systems for land rights. MIR (Modernizatsiia. Innovatsii. Razvitie) = MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research), 13 (2), pp. 222–237. https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2022.13.2.222-237. https://elibrary.ru/byjkwi.

Eliseeva, K. I. (2024). Use of Blockchain Technology to Counteract Illegal Financial Transactions. Vektor naucnoj mysli, (1), pp. 223–226. https://doi.org/10.58351/2949-2041.2024.6.1.013. https://elibrary.ru/xuyway.

Meshcheryakov, S. V., Shurshev, V. F. (2023). Application of Blockchain Technologies for Accounting and Registration of Land Plots. Engineering and Construction Bulletin of the Caspian Region, (4), pp. 112–115. https://doi.org/10.52684/2312-3702-2023-46-4-115-121. https://elibrary.ru/crkzlo.

Exter, E., Radosavljevic, M. (2024). Blockchain Technology in Commercial Real Estate: Developing a Conceptual Design for Smart Contracts. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, (55), pp. 434–458. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05517. https://elibrary.ru/flynfb.

Scherbakov, A. A. (2024) NFT technologies in the real estate investment sphere: a fad or the future that has come. Uridiceskij mir, (9), pp. 37–40. https://doi.org/10.18572/1811-1475-2024-9-37-40. https://elibrary.ru/xujjys.

Bennett, R., Miller, T., Pickering, M., Kara, A. K. (2021). Hybrid Approaches for Smart Contracts in Land Administration: Lessons from Three Blockchain Proofs-of-Concept. Land, 10 (2), pp. 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020220. https://elibrary.ru/xrmdbh.

Almadadha, R. (2025). Blockchain and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Australian Banks. Frontiers in Blockchain, vol. 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2025.1463633.

Maslov, A. V., Shvandar, K. V. (2023). New International Projects on the Use of Central Bank Digital Currencies in the Transformation of Cross-border Settlements. Financial Journal, 15 (2), pp. 47–58. https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2023-2-47-58. https://elibrary.ru/lvinpj.

Andryushin, S. A. (2024). Tokenization of real assets: classification, platforms, applications, opportunities and challenges of development. Russian Journal of Economics and Law, vol. 18, (1), pp. 88–104. https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2024.1.88-104. https://elibrary.ru/fcaudv.

Khmelevskaya, A. S., Kukartseva, A. N. (2024). Protection of intellectual property in the conditions of digital transformation of the economy. Economics and Innovation Management, (1), pp. 27–38. https://doi.org/10.26730/2587-5574-2024-1-27-38. https://elibrary.ru/ztrhcz.

Krasikov, D. V. (2022). Functioning and use of systems based on distributed registry technology (DLT): problems of determining applicable law and jurisdiction. Social and Humanitarian sciences: Domestic and foreign literature. Series 4: State and Law, (3), pp. 39–50. https://doi.org/10.31249/rgpravo/2022.03.04. https://elibrary.ru/iahwcx.

Aizenberg, E. (2023). Conflict and salience as drivers of corporate lobbying? An elite survey experiment. Governance, 36 (2), pp. 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12682. https://elibrary.ru/itnzoa.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Management Issues

Received: 15 August 2025 · Revised: 7 October 2025 · Accepted: 30 October 2025