Abstract
ABSTRACT
Introduction. The article reveals the methodology for constructing a rating of the Russian Federation subjects, which is based on the assessment of the managerial potential of candidates who have passed personal and professional diagnostics as a part of the federal reserve managerial personnel formation. The theoretical and methodological justification for the feasibility of such rating introducing, options and grounds for its construction have been provided, and the importance of the data obtained for the development of the state civil service have been discussed.
Materials and methods. In the process of calculation methodology rating creation, the results of 1,186 managers from 80 regions, who had passed personal and professional diagnostics (namely, the «Management Capacity Questianary») were analyzed as part of the formation of the federal reserve of management personnel in 2022. Speaking about the representation of managers by management levels, it should be noted that the primary and middle management levels have a greater representation in the assessment. Only 22 subjects of the Russian Federation (27.5%) submitted top management for inclusion in the reserve.
Results and conclusions. During the development, three pilot options for calculating the final rating of the management potential of the Russian Federation subjects have been proposed, the differentiating ability of each of the proposed rating options was described, allowing the identification of groups of subjects according to the level of expression of management potential, and a comparative analysis of the three options for calculating the rating was carried out.
Discussion. The data obtained during the study can be applied both in a broader context (regional personnel policy) and in a narrowly targeted manner, for example, in the formation of reserves of management personnel and increasing their prestige to increase the integral potential of a particular subject of the Russian Federation.
References
Синюк Т. Ю. Ретроспективный анализ методик рейтинговых оценок эффективности деятельности региональных властей РФ // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Ученые записки СКАГС. 2015. № 2. С. 228–235. EDN RXDSMR.
Taubenböck H., Reiter M., Dosch F., Leichtle T., Weigand M., Wurm M. (2021). Which city is the greenest? A multi-dimensional deconstruction of city rankings, Computers. Environment and Urban Systems, Volume 89, 101687. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101687. EDN SAHERT.
Francisco J. Goerlich, Ernest Reig (2021). Quality of life ranking of Spanish cities: A non-compensatory approach. Cities. Volume 109, 102979. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102979.
Wang D., Du Z., Wu H. (2020). Ranking global cities based on economic performance and climate change mitigation. Sustainable Cities and Society. Volume 62, 102395. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102395. EDN KDJJEM.
Akande A., Cabral P., Gomes P., Casteleyn S. (2019). The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe, Sustainable Cities and Society. Volume 44, рр. 475–487. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009.
Zarghami, E., Fatourehchi, D. (2020). Comparative analysis of rating systems in developing and developed countries: A systematic review and a future agenda towards a region-based sustainability assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120024. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120024. EDN LQGJKZ.
Lnenicka M., Luterek M., Nikiforova A. (2022). Benchmarking open data efforts through indices and rankings: Assessing development and contexts of use. Telematics and Informatics, Volume 66, 101745. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101745. EDN IRTIEF.
Панкратов А. А. Подходы к разработке рейтинга регионов России по уровню развития ИТ-индустрии // ИНТЕРКАРТО. ИНТЕРГИС. 2024. Т. 30, № 1. С. 193–207. DOI 10.35595/2414-9179-2024-1-30-193-207. EDN CFSNBI.
Karanina, E., Karaulov V., Tokareva P. (2024). Rating of Investment Potential of Regions and Their Digital Profiles // E3S Web of Conferences. 537. DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202453702005. EDN UWTFAC.
Егорова А. И. Построения рейтинга регионов Российской Федерации по уровню воздействия на водные ресурсы // Искусственные общества. 2024. T. 19, № 3. С. 3. DOI 10.18254/S207751800032384-1. EDN UIODWY.
Руденко Л. Г., Караулов В. М. Методика оценки инфраструктурного обеспечения малого предпринимательства в субъектах Российской Федерации // Известия Тульского государственного университета. Экономические и юридические науки. 2017. № 1-1. С. 231–241. EDN YHCVEL.
Петренко Л. Д. ESG-Трансформация и устойчивое развитие территорий // Международный журнал гуманитарных и естественных наук. 2023. № 8-1 (83). С. 147–148. DOI 24412/2500-1000-2023-8-1-147-150. EDN KISPHC.
Berendeeva A. (2024). Applied aspects of Russian regions ESG-transformation // Journal of regional and international competitiveness. 5 (3), pp. 53–65. DOI 10.52957/2782-1927-2024-5-3-53-65. EDN HDYWTG.
Крошилин С. В., Медведева Е. И. Методика ранжирования федеральных округов по социально-экономическим показателям // Народонаселение. 2024. Т. 27, № 3. С. 85–97. DOI 10.24412/1561-7785-2024-3-85-97. EDN WUBVEN.
Казанцева Е. Г. Проблемы качества жизни населения: региональный аспект // Региональная экономика и управление: электронный научный журнал. 2022. № 3 (71). Ст. № 7101. EDN JNRLMD.
Чазова И. Ю., Мухин А. А., Мухина И. А. Рейтинг регионов России по уровню вовлеченности населения в социально ориентированную деятельность // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия «Экономика и право». 2024. № 3. С. 481–482. DOI 10.35634/2412-9593-2024-34-3-481-486. EDN DDAKEJ.
Бочанов М. А. Перспективы применения системы социального рейтинга в современной российской политике // Власть. 2024. Т. 32, № 3. С. 91–93. DOI 10.24412/2071-5358-2024-3-91-93. EDN STSDJJ.
Васильева Е. В. Социально-психологический потенциал регионов России: состояние и тенденции // Региональная экономика: теория и практика. 2013. № 27. С. 32–44. EDN QIWIDH.
Жихарева А. К. Возможные проблемы применения региональных рейтингов // Управленческое консультирование. 2019. № 10 (130). С. 49–50. DOI 10.22394/1726-1139-2019-10-49-60. EDN QEUVQX.
Буренина И. В., Быль Е. А. Рейтинговая система оценки устойчивого развития территориальных субъектов: российский и мировой опыт // Интернет-журнал Науковедение. 2016. Т. 8, № 2 (33). С. 17. DOI 10.15862/99EVN216. EDN VZXCOJ.
Лисова Е. В. Возможность создания единого методологического подхода к оценке уровня социального развития российских регионов // Экономические и социально-гуманитарные исследования. 2023. № 3 (39). С. 93–101. DOI 10.24151/2409-1073-2023-3-93-101. EDN IEASKX.
Синягин Ю. В. Опросник управленческого потенциала: история и новые возможности // Личность: ресурсы и потенциал. 2021. № 2 (10). С. 5–10. EDN HNYYLD.
Синягин Ю. В. Управленческий потенциал и управленческая готовность: особенности оценки // Личность: ресурсы и потенциал. 2021. № 3 (11). С. 39–46. EDN TJLLZE.
Шебураков И. Б. Резервы управленческих кадров в Российской Федерации как инструмент развития кадрового состава сферы государственного управления// Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Государственное и муниципальное управление. 2019. Т. 6, № 2. С. 148–157. DOI 10.22363/2312-8313-2019-6-2-148-157. EDN SHEFPW.
Шебураков И. Б., Татаринова Л. Н. Кадровые резервы в Российской Федерации (Научные доклады: государственное управление). Москва : Дело РАНХиГС, 2021. 128 с. EDN QLSTDU.
Комиссаров А. Г., Шебураков И. Б. Кадровые резервы в системе государственного управления: опыт и новые смыслы // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2024. № 1. C. 19. DOI 10.17323/1999-5431-2024-0-1-7-38. EDN CNIEGH.
Sinyuk, T. Yu. (2015) Retrospective analysis of techniques ratings performance of Russian Federation regional authorities. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes, (2), pp. 228–235. https://elibrary.ru/rxdsmr.
Taubenbock, H., Reiter, M., Dosch, F., Leichtle, T., Weigand, M., Wurm, M. (2021) Which city is the greenest? A multi-dimensional deconstruction of city rankings. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, (89), 101687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101687. https://elibrary.ru/sahert.
Francisco, J. Goerlich, Ernest Reig (2021) Quality of life ranking of Spanish cities: A non-compensatory approach. Cities, (109), 102979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102979.
Wang, D., Du, Z., Wu, H. (2020) Ranking global cities based on economic performance and climate change mitigation. Sustainable Cities and Society, (62), 102395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102395. https://elibrary.ru/kdjjem.
Akande, A., Cabral, P., Gomes, P., Casteleyn, S. (2019) The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe. Sustainable Cities and Society, (44), pp. 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009.
Zarghami, E., Fatourehchi, D. (2020) Comparative analysis of rating systems in developing and developed countries: A systematic review and a future agenda towards a region-based sustainability assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, (254), 120024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120024. https://elibrary.ru/lqgjkz.
Lnenicka, M., Luterek, M., Nikiforova, A. (2022) Benchmarking open data efforts through indices and rankings: Assessing development and contexts of use. Telematics and Informatics, (66), 101745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101745. https://elibrary.ru/irtief.
Pankratov, A. (2024) Approaches to developing ratings of Russian regions by level of IT industry development. InterCarto. InterGIS, (30), pp. 193–207. https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2024-1-30-193-207. https://elibrary.ru/cfsnbi.
Karanina, E., Karaulov, V., Tokareva, P. (2024) Rating of Investment Potential of Regions and Their Digital Profiles. E3S Web of Conferences, 537, 02005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202453702005. https://elibrary.ru/uwtfac.
Egorova, A. I. (2024) Constructing a rating of regions of the Russian Federation by the level of impact on water resources. Artificial societies, 19 (3), p. 3. https://doi.org/10.18254/S207751800032384-1. https://elibrary.ru/uiodwy.
Rudenko, L. G., Karaulov, V. M. (2017) Infrastructure assessment methodology provide small businesses in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. News of Tula State University. Izvestia Tulʹskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomiceskie i uridiceskie nauki, (1-1), pp. 231–241. https://elibrary.ru/yhcvel.
Petrenko, L.D. (2023) ESG-Transformation and sustainable development of territories. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, no. 8-1 (83), pp. 147–148. https://doi.org/24412/2500-1000-2023-8-1-147-150. https://elibrary.ru/kisphc.
Berendeeva, A. (2024) Applied aspects of Russian regions ESG-transformation. Journal of regional and international competitiveness, 5 (3), pp. 53–65. https://doi.org/10.52957/2782-1927-2024-5-3-53-65. https://elibrary.ru/hdywtg.
Kroshilin, S. V., Medvedeva, E. I. (2024) The methodology of ranking federal districts by socio-economic indicators. Narodonaselenie [Population], 27 (3), pp. 85–97. https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-3-85-97. https://elibrary.ru/wubven.
Kazantseva, E. G. (2022) Problems of Quality of Life: regional aspect. Regional economy and management: electronic scientific journal, no. 3 (71). Article number 7101. https://elibrary.ru/jnrlmd.
Chazova, I. Yu., Mukhin, A. A., Mukhina, I. A. (2024) Rating of Russian regions by the level of population involvement in socially-oriented activities. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Economics and law, (3), pp. 481–482. https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9593-2024-34-3-481-48. https://elibrary.ru/ddakej.
Bochanov, M. A. (2024) Prospects for the USE of the social rating system in modern Russian politics. Vlast, 32 (3), pp. 91–93. https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-5358-2024-3-91-93. https://elibrary.ru/stsdjj.
Vasilyeva, E. V. (2013) Social and Psychological Potential of Russian Regions: Status and Trends. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, (27), pp. 32–44. https://elibrary.ru/qiwidh.
Zhikhareva, A. K. (2019) Possible problems with the USE of regional ratings. Administrative consulting, no. 10 (130), pp. 49–50. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-10-49-60. https://elibrary.ru/qeuvqx.
Burenina, I. V., Byl, E. A. (2016) Rating assessment system of sustainable territorial development of regions: Russian and international experience. The Eurasian Scientific Journal, 8 (2), p. 17. https://doi.org/10.15862/99EVN216. https://elibrary.ru/vzxcoj.
Lisova, E. V. (2023) Possibility of creating a unified methodological approach to assessing the level of social development of Russian regions. Economic and Social Research, no. 3 (39), pp. 93–101. https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2023-3-93-101. https://elibrary.ru/ieaskx.
Sinyagin, Yu. V. (2021) Management capacity questionnaire: history and new opportunities. Personality: Resources and Potential, no. 2 (10), pp. 5–10. https://elibrary.ru/hnyyld.
Sinyagin, Yu.V. (2021) Managerial potential and managerial readiness: evaluation features. Personality: Resources and Potential, no. 3 (11), pp. 39–46. https://elibrary.ru/tjllze.
Sheburakov, I. B. (2019) Reserves of managerial personnel in the Russian Federation as a tool for the development of personnel in the field of public administration. Bulletin of Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series Public administration, 6 (2), pp. 148–157. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2019-6-2-148-157. https://elibrary.ru/shefpw.
Sheburakov, I. B., Tatarinova, L. N. (2021) Personnel reserves in the Russian Federation. (Scientific reports: public administration) Moscow, Publ. Delo RANEPA, 128 p. https://elibrary.ru/qlstdu.
Komissarov, A. G., Sheburakov, I. B. (2024) Personnel reserves in the public administration system: experience and new meanings. Public administration issues, (1), p. 19. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2024-0-1-7-38. https://elibrary.ru/cniegh.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Management Issues