Government and public administration

Economic geocode of the old industrial region: assessment of aptitude to innovative development

Received: 15.06.2020 Published: 15.06.2020

EDN: CJCCHQ DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2020-6-29-39

Full text

Abstract

The article is devoted to solving the standard problems of an old industrial region in the framework of the application of a genetic approach, which examines the geocode of the territory that is a system of its hereditary records, which determines its economic specifics and aptitude to various endogenous processes. The purpose of the article is to prove the scientific hypothesis that the economic geocode of an old industrial region illustrates not only its low innovation capacity, but also its weak aptitude to innovative development, which hinders the industrial renewal of the territory. To prove the hypothesis it was necessary to solve the following tasks: to reveal the economic identity of the functioning of old industrial regions that determine the specificity of their geocode; to develop a method of assessing the aptitude of an old industrial region to innovative development in terms of its economic geocode territory; to test the guidelines identifying the transforming directions of the innovation component in the economic geocode of an old industrial region. The research is based on the author’s matrix method for identifying the aptitude of the old industrial territory to innovative development using evaluation indicators that reflect the demand, quality and capacity of scientific and innovative performance of universities, which are the basic generators of innovative ideas and applied technical developments for industrial enterprises in the region. Approbation of the author’s method and proof of the scientific hypothesis were carried out within the context of the Sverdlovsk, Tyumen and Chelyabinsk regions of the Ural region. The assumption that the old industrial region has a low predisposition to innovative development turned out to be correct. It was also found that the Sverdlovsk region has the greatest propensity for innovative development, although its value is not high at the interregional level of comparisons. The obtained results indicate that the geocode considered old-industrial region contains the values of the performance indicators, yielding similar indicators of the Central territories of the Russian Federation that actualizes the necessity of improving the organization of scientific and innovation activities of leading universities in the territories in the context of transformation of their economic geocode.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Мыслякова Ю.Г. ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЙ ГЕОКОД СТАРОПРОМЫШЛЕННОГО РЕГИОНА: ОЦЕНКА ПРЕДРАСПОЛОЖЕННОСТИ К ИННОВАЦИОННОМУ РАЗВИТИЮ // Вопросы управления. 2020. Т. 67, № 6. С. 29–39. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2020-6-29-39

For citation:

Myslyakova Y.G. Economic geocode of the old industrial region: assessment of aptitude to innovative development // Management Issues. 2020. Vol. 67, no. 6. P. 29–39. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2020-6-29-39

How to Cite

Myslyakova Y.G. Economic geocode of the old industrial region: assessment of aptitude to innovative development // Management Issues. 2020. Vol. 67, no. 6. P. 29–39. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2020-6-29-39

References

  1. Майминас Е. (2016). Социально-экономический генотип общества // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 6. Экономика. № 4. С. 186-204.
  2. Mayminas E. (2016). Socio-economic genotype of society, Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. 6. Economy, no. 4, pp. 186-204.
  3. Мартишин Е.М. (2014). Эволюционные механизмы модернизации в стратегии региона // Региональная экономика: теория и практика. № 13 (340). С. 9-19.
  4. Martishin E.M. (2014). Evolutionary mechanisms of modernization in the strategy of the region, Regional economy: theory and practice, no. 13 (340), pp. 9-19.
  5. Мартишин Е.М. (2014). Эволюционно-институциональные основы "экономического чуда" // Ученые записки Петрозаводского государственного университета. № 5. С. 97-101.
  6. Martishin E.M. (2014). Evolutionary-institutional foundations of the "economic miracle", Scientific notes of Petrozavodsk State University, no. 5, pp. 97-101.
  7. Carney J., Hudson R., Lewis J. (1980). Regions in Crisis. London, Croom Helm, pp. 28-59.
  8. Carney J., Hudson R., Lewis J. (1980). Regions in Crisis. London, Croom Helm, pp. 28-59.
  9. Steiner М. (2009). Old Industrial Areas: A Theoretical Approach. In: Trajectories of the New Economy: Regeneration and Dislocation in the Inner City. Urban Studies. no 46, pp. 987-1001.
  10. Steiner М. (2009). Old Industrial Areas: A Theoretical Approach. In: Trajectories of the New Economy: Regeneration and Dislocation in the Inner City. Urban Studies. no 46, pp. 987-1001.
  11. Гранберг А.Г., Артоболевский С.С., Ковалева Г.А. (1998). Реструктуризация старопромышленных регионов: опыт России и мира // Региональное развитие и сотрудничество. № 1. С. 4.
  12. Granberg A.G., Artobolevsky S.S., Kovaleva G.A. (1998). Restructuring of old industrial regions: experience of Russia and the world, Regional development and cooperation, no. 1, p. 4.
  13. Tödtling F., Trippl M. (2004). One Size Fits All? Towards a Differentiated Policy Approach with Respect to Regional Innovation Systems. Vienna, Institut für Wirtschaftsgeographie, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, pp. 38-40.
  14. Tödtling F., Trippl M. (2004). One Size Fits All? Towards a Differentiated Policy Approach with Respect to Regional Innovation Systems. Vienna, Institut für Wirtschaftsgeographie, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, pp. 38-40.
  15. Глонти К.М. (2008). Старопромышленные регионы: проблемы и перспективы развития. Проблемы федерализма // Регионология. № 4. С. 27-39.
  16. Glonti K.M. (2008). Old industrial regions: problems and development prospects. Problems of federalism, Regionology, no. 4, pp. 27-39.
  17. Литовченко С.В. (2014). Анализ современных подходов к определению сущности старопромышленных регионов // Экономический простор. № 92. С. 138-150.
  18. Litovchenko S.V. (2014). Analysis of modern approaches to the definition of the essence of old industrial regions, Economic space, no. 92, pp. 138-150.
  19. Сорокина Н.Ю., Латов Ю.В. (2018). Эволюция старопромышленных регионов в экономике России // Вопросы регулирования экономики. Т. 9. № 1. С. 6-22.
  20. Sorokina N.Yu., Latov Yu.V. (2018). Evolution of old industrial regions in the Russian economy, Issues of economic regulation, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 6-22.
  21. Запарий В.В. (2010). Индустриальное наследие: выявление, изучение, использование // Экономическая история. № 3. С. 4-10.
  22. Zapariy V.V. (2010). Industrial heritage: identification, study, use, Economic history, no. 3, pp. 4-10.
  23. Силин Я.П., Анимица Е.Г., Новикова Н.В. (2019). Уральский макрорегион: большие циклы индустриализации / под. ред.: С. Ю. Глазьева, С. Д. Бодрунова. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. гос. экон. ун-та. 371 с.
  24. Silin Ya.P., Animitsa E.G., Novikova N.V. (2019). Ural macroregion: large cycles of industrialization. Eds: S.Yu. Glazyev, S.D. Bodrunov. Yekaterinburg, Publishing House of the Ural State University of Economics. 371 p.
  25. Богословский П.С. (1927). О постановке культурно-исторических изучений Урала // Уральское краеведение. Вып. 1. Свердловск: Уральское бюро краеведения. С. 36-37. URL: http://www.academia.edu/20787288/Уральское_краеведение._Свердловск_1927._Вып._1 (дата обращения: 22.03.2018).
  26. Bogoslovsky P.S. (1927). On the organization of cultural and historical studies of the Urals. Ural Regional Studies. Issue 1. Sverdlovsk: Ural Regional Bureau, pp. 36-37. URL: http://www.academia.edu/20787288/Уральское_краеведение._Свердловск_1927._Вып._1 (accessed 22.03.2018).
  27. Мамин-Сибиряк Д.Н. Город Екатеринбург. Исторический очерк. URL: http://www.1723.ru/read/books/city-yekaterinburg.htm (дата обращения: 25.03.2018).
  28. Mamin-Sibiryak D.N. Yekaterinburg city. Historical sketch. URL: http://www.1723.ru/read/books/city-yekaterinburg.htm (accessed 25.03.2018).
  29. Менделеев Д.И. (2002). К познанию России. М.: Айрис-пресс. С. 385-430.
  30. Mendeleev D.I. (2002). To the knowledge of Russia. Moscow, Iris-press, pp. 385-430.