Government and public administration

CONCEPTUAL BASES OF ELECTRONIC PUBLIC SERVICES: ECONOMIC ASPECT

Received: 15.01.2019 Published: 15.01.2019

UDC: 330.12 EDN: MNZHJX DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2019-1-117-123

Full text

Abstract

Purpose. To carry out a critical analysis and gain understanding of the specific properties of the service as a form of the produced goods in order to conceptualize public electronic services. Methods. Interpretative approach; interdisciplinary approach; method of analysis and synthesis. Scientific novelty. The author conducted a critical analysis and gave a new interpretation of the specific properties of the service as a form of produced goods. Results. A new interpretation and interpretation of the specific properties of the service as a form of the good produced was proposed, which is important in the context of the conceptualization of public electronic services; a strategy for the follow-up research of public electronic services, which is defined as a strategy of inter-variative variation was introduced.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Станислав Г.Е. Концептуальные основы электронных публичных услуг: экономический аспект // Вопросы управления. 2019. Т. 37, № 1. С. 117–123. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-1-117-123

For citation:

Станислав Г.Е. CONCEPTUAL BASES OF ELECTRONIC PUBLIC SERVICES: ECONOMIC ASPECT // Management Issues. 2019. Vol. 37, no. 1. P. 117–123. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-1-117-123

How to Cite

Станислав Г.Е. CONCEPTUAL BASES OF ELECTRONIC PUBLIC SERVICES: ECONOMIC ASPECT // Management Issues. 2019. Vol. 37, no. 1. P. 117–123. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-1-117-123

References

  1. Lindgren I., Jansson G. Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework // Government Information Quarterly. 2013. 30: 2. P. 163-172.
  2. Yildiz M. E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward // Government Quarterly. 2007. 24 (3). P. 646-665.
  3. Heeks R., Bailur S. Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice // Government Information Quarterly. 2007. 24(2). P. 243-265.
  4. Sartori G. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics // The American Political Science Review. 1970. 64(4). P. 1033-1053.
  5. Scholl H.J. Central Research Question in E-government, or which trajectory should the study domain take? // Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. 2007. 1(1). P. 67-88.
  6. Ostrom E. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. 2005.
  7. Grönroos С. Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co-creates? // European Business Review. 2008. 20(4). P. 298-314.
  8. Kotler P., Keller K. Marketing Management, 13 th edition, London: Pearson Education Ltd. 2009.
  9. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V.A., Berry L.L. A conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research // Journal of Marketing. 1985. 49(4). P. 41-50.
  10. Zeithaml V.A., Parasuraman A., Berry, L.L. Delivering Quality Service. Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations. New York: The Free Press. 1990.