Government and public administration

DIGITAL ECONOMY AS PART OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL PLATFORM OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION

Received: 15.01.2017 Published: 15.01.2017

UDC: 004:[33:351] EDN: ZXJERB

Full text

Abstract

The research analyzes economic activity based on digital technologies, providing for the introduction of information technologies into all sectors and spheres of activity. An attempt is made to highlight the importance of digital technologies which stimulate economic growth, new opportunities are revealed and the quality of services is improved. The research comes to the conclusion that digital technologies are the basis for the perspective growth of the economy and the quality of public administration. Also, the reasons for the qualitative demand for digital technology are identified. Methods. The research methodology is based on the principles of sociological estimation and data interpretation. In the course of the research, the researcher's self-reflection, cognitive approach in economic theory turned out to be the most effective methods. Results. Approaches to the development of integrated assessment of the technologies introduction and the digital economy growth have been analyzed; conclusions are made on the existing experience of boosting the use of digital technologies, of digital technologies trend in developed, transitional and developing economies; also, the use of digital dividends as benefits for social and economic development have been estimated. Scope of application. The research findings can be useful for executive bodies, improving the quality of public administration and the transition to new digital technologies in e-government. Scientific novelty and practical significance. Methodological approaches to assess the introduction of information technologies in all sectors and spheres of activity are identified, problem areas of digital technologies use in developed, transitional and developing countries and e-government have been revealed.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Большаков С., Лескова И., Большакова Ю. Цифровая экономика как составляющая технологической платформы государственной политики и управления // Вопросы управления. 2017. Т. 44, № 1. С. 64–70.

For citation:

Bolshakov S., Leskova I., Bolshakova Y. DIGITAL ECONOMY AS PART OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL PLATFORM OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION // Management Issues. 2017. Vol. 44, no. 1. P. 64–70.

How to Cite

Bolshakov S., Leskova I., Bolshakova Y. DIGITAL ECONOMY AS PART OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL PLATFORM OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION // Management Issues. 2017. Vol. 44, no. 1. P. 64–70.

References

  1. Скотт Э. Электронное правительство - шаг на пути создания цифрового [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://ac.gov.ru/events/08510.html (дата обращения 10.01.2017).
  2. Anderson J., Rainie L. The future of the internet // Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. P. 22.
  3. Hindman M. The Myth of Digital Democracy // Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press. 2008.
  4. Gauld R., Shaun G. Dangerous Enthusiasms: E-Government, Computer Failure, and Information System Development // Dunedin. New Zealand: Otago University Press. 2006.
  5. Digital dividends. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development // The World Bank. 2016. P. 359.
  6. Материалы круглого стола «Цифровое развитие в России». 12.апреля 2016 года. М.: Всемирный банк. Аналитический Центр Правительства РФ. Институт развития информационного общества. С.12.
  7. World Bank. Various years. World Development Indicators (database). World Bank [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators (дата обращения 10.01.2017).
  8. Defending the Digital Frontier: A Special Report on Cybersecurity. July. Economist. 2014 [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21606416-companies-markets-and-countries-are-increasingly-under-attack-cyber-criminals (дата обращения 10.01.2017).
  9. Autor D., Dorn D. The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market // American Economic Review. 2013. № 103(5). P. 1553-1597.
  10. Bolshakov S., Bolshakova Yu.M. Cloud technologies in integrated communications strategy to promote // Asia social science. Special Issue. 2015. Vol. 11. №19.
  11. Castro D. The False Promise of Data Nationalism // Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. 2013. [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www2.itif.org/2013-false-promise-data-nationalism.pdf (дата обращения 10.01.2017).
  12. Garicano L., Paul H. Information Technology, Organization, and Productivity in the Public Sector: Evidence from Police Departments // Journal of Labor Economics 2010. № 28(1). P. 167-201.
  13. Goyal A. Information, Direct Access to Farmers, and Rural Market Performance in Central India // American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2010. № 2 (3). P. 22-45.
  14. Heyneman S.P., Jonathan M.B. Stern. 2014. Low Cost Private Schools for the Poor: What Public Policy Is Appropriate? // International Journal of Educational Development № 35 (March). P. 3-15.
  15. Peppet S.R. Regulating the Internet of Things: First Steps toward Managing Discrimination, Privacy, Security, and Consent // Texas Law Review № 93 (85). 2014. P. 87-176.
  16. Policy Note. World Bank. Washington, DC. [электронный ресурс]. URL: https://wsp.org/sites/wsp.org/files/publications/WSP-MajiVoice-New-Accountability-Tool-to-Improve-Public-Services.pdf (дата обращения 10.01.2017).
  17. Wood D. EU Competition Law and the Internet: Present and Past Cases // Competition Law International. April. 2011. P. 44-49.
  18. World Bank. MajiVoice: A New Accountability Tool to Improve Public Services. Water and Sanitation. 2015.
  19. Большакова Ю.М. Инновации в предоставлении интегрированных государственных услуг: опыт Австралии // Региональные проблемы преобразования экономики. Институт социально-экономических исследований ДНЦ РАН. 2014. №10.
  20. Большакова Ю.М. Удовлетворенность населения Республики Коми оказанием муниципальных услуг: опыт эмпирического исследования // Вопросы управления. 2015. №6.