Government and public administration

SATISFACTION OF THE POPULATION WITH THE TERRITORY OF ACCOMMODATION AS A FACTOR OF DEVELOPMENT OF CITY COMANAGING (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE EKATERINBURG CITY)

Received: 15.06.2016 Published: 15.06.2016

UDC: 316.334 EDN: ZXJEEJ

Full text

Abstract

Purpose. The analysis of people's level of satisfaction with various areas of life in the places of residence as information basis of development of the concept of perspective development of residential districts of Ekaterinburg. Methods. We used stratified sample of respondents who live in Ekaterinburg city (N=3547). We applied SPSS 22.0 for data analysis. Descriptive statistics, the correlation analysis and tests for independent samples were used. Results. The received estimates of citizens demonstrate differentiation of residential districts by value judgment of the population. The most safe on «feelings» of citizens: new residential districts with actively developing infrastructure; «old» prestigious residential districts of the downtown; the brought closer to the center and sleeping residential districts with the developed infrastructure. Significant correlations between the level of satisfaction and social and demographic characteristics of respondents are revealed: the assessment of financial position is higher, the degree of satisfaction with various areas of life in districts is higher. We found distinctions in estimates of some areas of life in residential districts depending on sex and an occupation of respondents. Results of research will form the basis of the Concept of perspective development of residential districts of the municipality of Ekaterinburg city till 2035 (the municipal contract No. 15/2016-2 of 17.11.2016). Scientific novelty. The realized research project is the first empirical work on microdifferentiation of the territories of accommodation in Ekaterinburg city. The significance of a study of satisfaction of inhabitants as element of a technique of applied urbanistic researches is shown. Use of results of such researches in the course of the municipal government, on the one hand, increases the level of validity of the made decisions, and on the another hand bring closer it to the models of city comanaging which were extremely demanded today.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Багирова А., Нотман О. Удовлетворенность населения территорией проживания как фактор развития городского соуправления (на примере г. Екатеринбурга) // Вопросы управления. 2016. Т. 43, № 6. С. 97–103.

For citation:

Bagirova A., Notman O. SATISFACTION OF THE POPULATION WITH THE TERRITORY OF ACCOMMODATION AS A FACTOR OF DEVELOPMENT OF CITY COMANAGING (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE EKATERINBURG CITY) // Management Issues. 2016. Vol. 43, no. 6. P. 97–103.

How to Cite

Bagirova A., Notman O. SATISFACTION OF THE POPULATION WITH THE TERRITORY OF ACCOMMODATION AS A FACTOR OF DEVELOPMENT OF CITY COMANAGING (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE EKATERINBURG CITY) // Management Issues. 2016. Vol. 43, no. 6. P. 97–103.

References

  1. Трубина Е.Г. Город в теории: опыт осмысления пространства. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2011. 520 с.
  2. Заборова Е.Н. Городское управление. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2014. 296 с.
  3. Управление пространственно-экономическим развитием города: скрытые ресурсы/Е. Короткова, К. Мокрушина, Е. Куричева, С. Журавлев, И. Ирбитская. М.: Центр городских исследований бизнес-школы СКОЛКОВО, 2016. 212 с.
  4. Стратегический план развития Екатеринбурга . URL: https://екатеринбург.рф/%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE/%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%8F(дата обращения 10.01.2017).
  5. Зубаревич Н. Крупные города России: лидеры и аутсайдеры//Демоскоп Weekly. 15-28 апреля 2013. № 551-552. С. 1-17. . URL: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2013/0551/demoscope551.pdf (дата обращения 12.01.2017).
  6. Социальный атлас российских регионов. Мониторинг Независимого Института Социальной политики . URL:http://www.socpol.ru/atlas/overviews/social_sphere/kris.shtml (дата обращения 12.01.2017).
  7. UN-HABITAT Urban Governance Index . URL: http://mirror.unhabitat.org/content.asp?typeid=19&catid=25&cid=2167 (дата обращения 12.01.2017).
  8. Борьба за горожанина: Человеческий потенциал и городская среда/под ред. А. Высоковского. М.: Высшая школа урбанистики НИУ ВШЭ; IVМосковский урбанистический форум, 2014. 102 с.
  9. Академический стал самым популярным районом Екатеринбурга для покупки нового жилья . URL: http://urbc.ru/1068063666-akademicheskiy-stal-samym-populyarnym-rayonom-ekaterinburga-dlya-pokupki-novogo-zhilya.html (дата обращения 12.01.2017).
  10. Об экспериментальных инвестиционных проектах комплексного освоения территорий в целях жилищного строительства: Постановление Правительства Российской Федерации от 5 мая 2007 г. N 265//Российская газета. 2007. 12 мая.
  11. Академический стал лидером просмотров на портале поиска жилья в Екатеринбурге . URL: http://tass.ru/novosti-partnerov/3969726 (дата обращения 12.01.2017).