Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of the study stems from the risks that unresolved generational contradictions may pose to the quality of education and research, personnel reproduction, and the sustainability of higher education institutions. The aim of the article is to identify and systematize key problem areas and conflict triggers, as well as to propose ways to harmonize intergenerational interactions in the contemporary Russian university.
Materials and methods. The empirical basis consists of 41 semi-structured interviews with academic and teaching staff (n=20) and administrative and managerial staff (n=21) from universities of the Ural Federal District. The sample has been formed considering regional representation, type of university, disciplinary profile, and level of management. A combination of qualitative and quantitative text processing methods has been used for the analysis, including the extraction of semantic cores of the interviews, frequency analysis of keywords, and data visualization.
Results. Even though informants generally characterize relations as conflict-free, a detailed analysis reveals latent problem areas capable of causing damage in the long term. Among these problem areas are the technological gap, value differences, mutual misunderstanding, and competition for resources (positions, funding, staff units). According to respondents, the main triggers exacerbating these problems are digitalization, the consequences of the pandemic, state policy (the "Priority-2030" program and similar initiatives), educational reforms, and increased workload. The attitude towards the existing policy of staff rejuvenation is ambiguous, and its main risk is perceived to be the loss of experience, generation gap, and disappearance of scientific schools.
Discussion. Based on the results, four principles aimed at harmonizing intergenerational relations are proposed: 1) equality and mutual respect; 2) continuous and mutual learning, including the institutionalization of mentoring; 3) a balanced age policy that considers risks to knowledge continuity; 4) fostering an inclusive corporate spirit. The obtained data and conclusions can be used to develop effective personnel and management policies in universities aimed at turning multi-generational composition into a key resource for development.
References
Зборовский Г. Е., Дроздова А. А., Кеммет Е. В. Концепция поколенческих взаимодействий в вузе: критический анализ отечественных и зарубежных теоретико-методологических подходов // Высшее образование в России. 2025. Т. 34, № 10. С. 27-46. DOI https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-10-27-46. EDN QTLGGN.
Joshi, A., Dencker, J. C., Franz, G. (2011). Generations in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, (31), 177-205. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.002.
Зборовский Г. Е., Амбарова П. А. Функции поколений образовательных общностей в вузе // Высшее образование в России. 2025. Т. 34, № 7. С. 9-26. DOI http://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-7-9-26. EDN ILILAI.
Бровкин А. В. Проблемы современной российской системы высшего образования и пути их решения в интересах всех участников образовательного процесса: часть 1 // Современное образование. 2018. № 1. С. 1-10. DOI http://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8736.2018.1.25053. EDN YUDZRZ.
Пугач В. Ф. Ещё раз о возрасте преподавателей в российских вузах: старые проблемы и новые тенденции // Высшее образование в России. 2023. Т. 32, № 3. С. 118-133. DOI https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-3-118-133. EDN TRAEQT.
Van Rossem, A. H. D. (2019). Generations as social categories: An exploratory cognitive study of generational identity and generational stereotypes in a multigenerational workforce. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 40 (4), 434-455. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.2341.
Дуракова И. Б., Майер Е. В. Успешность работников старших возрастов как вызов высшей школе // Высшее образование в России. 2021. Т. 30, № 6. С. 144-155. DOI https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-6-144-155. EDN MJFZWC.
Фёдоров А. А., Илалтдинова Е. Ю., Фролова С. В. "Конвенция поколений" в новом мире образования // Высшее образование в России. 2018. Т. 27, № 7. С. 28-38. DOI https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-7-28-38. EDN XUAQOD.
Christian, K., Johnstone, C., Larkins, J.A., Wright, W., Doran, M. R. (2021). A survey of early-career researchers in Australia. Elife, (10), e60613. DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60613. EDN OOZOSC.
Shahbaz, S., Azam, S., Iqbal, K. (2025). Challenges Faced by Young Researchers: A Quantitative Investigation. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 5 (1), 130-139. DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15008077.
Нидергаус Е. О. Профессиональные ценности преподавателей разных поколений в условиях перехода к модели предпринимательского вуза // Вестник Сургутского государственного педагогического университета. 2023. № 5 (86). С. 43-49. DOI https://doi.org/10.26105/SSPU.2023.86.5.004. EDN MOHWHR.
Kumwenda S., El Hadji A. N., Orondo P. W., William, P., Oyinlola, L., Bongo, G. N., Chiwona, B. (2017). Challenges facing young African scientists in their research careers: A qualitative exploratory study. Malawi Medical Journal, 29 (1), 1-4. DOI https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v29i1.1.
Jubair, H., Mehenaz, M., Islam, M.M. (2025). In the Pursuit of Research: Investigating the Difficulties Faced by Aspiring Young Researchers in Bangladesh. COMPETITIVE: Journal of Education, 4 (2), 185-195. DOI https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4847310/v1. EDN BUHVDB.
Adelakun, N. O. (2023). Mentoring young academia: A prerequisite for scholarly publishing. Trends in Scholarly Publishing, 2 (1), 27-30. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4943055.
Turner, R., Huang, R., Poverjuc, O., Wyness, L. (2016). What role do teaching mentors play in supporting new university lecturers to develop their teaching practices? Professional development in education, 42 (4), pp. 647-665. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1065898.
Баранов Н. В., Масюк А. А., Васильева А. Е., Рябоконева Е. В., Осипова Е. Ю. К вопросу об интеграции молодежи в научно-исследовательскую работу // Вестник СНО СПбГУ. Науки об обществе. 2024. Т. 1, № 2. С. 139-150. URL https://documents.spbu.ru/images/vestnik/tom2_2024/baranov.pdf. EDN RCVORK.
Гиндес Е. Г., Троян И. А., Кравченко Л. А. Наставничество в высшем образовании: концепция, модель и перспективы развития // Высшее образование в России. 2023. Т. 32, № 8-9. С. 110-129. DOI https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-8-9-110-129. EDN TFJZYE.
Son, N. T., Nguyen, Q. N. (2023). Factors affecting the creativity of young lecturers. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8 (6), e04333. DOI https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i6.2487. EDN LBCJIQ.
Mohamad M. S., Baidi N., Suhaimi Mohamad M. (2023). Relationship between Psychological Stress and Mental Health among Young Lecturers. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 44, pp. 120-130. DOI https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.07.02.96.
Di Giacomo, D., Cilli, E., Ranieri, J., Guerra, F., Martelli, A. (2024). Mental health of young researchers in academia: Towards to growth perspective. Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry, 43-44, 100116. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmip.2024.100116. EDN LCJQHC.