Abstract
Introduction. In the modern world, educational organizations have to face the increasing competition in the field of education, research and innovation, meaning they need to improve their position, achieve sustainability, and develop the implementation of the “third mission”, which implies interaction with the microenvironment. Limited resources in the broad sense of the word lead to the need to rank various groups of stakeholders in order to satisfy demands so that they support the development strategy of an educational facility.
Materials and methods. A number of foreign and domestic sources, representing the development of the stakeholder management theory in relation to educational organizations, have been selected and individual theses, ideas and proposals are shown. Based on the available scientific developments of the theory and practice of stakeholder management and the “third mission” management of an educational organization, the article presents the author’s methodology for ranking stakeholders of an educational organization, aimed at including the axiological foundations of interaction in the field of parameters, when analyzing stakeholders of an educational organization with the adaptation of the “cité theory” by Thévenot and Boltanski.
Results. Approbation of the author’s ranking methodology is presented using the example of a specific educational organization, as a result of which, the balance and intensity of connections between stakeholders in the system of relationships have been studied, and the predominance of project and reputational value principles of interaction in stakeholder groups of an educational organization has been revealed; distribution by quadrants or strategic portfolios scheme has been formed for the further proposals formation and relationships development programs design, taking into account leading values. Discussion. Value-driven interaction considering stakeholders’ “exchange units” can define a strategy to meet stakeholders’ needs and expectations. In the context of educational institutions, the development of stakeholder interaction can lead to competitive advantages and support for strategic decisions of the organization in conditions of local and global restrictions, particularly when focusing on the search for non-financial interaction and meeting the needs.
References
Chapleo, C., & Simms, C. (2010). Stakeholder analysis in higher education: A case study of the University of Portsmouth. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 14(1), 12-20. DOI: 10.1080/13603100903458034
Wagner Mainardes, E., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2012). A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships. Management Decision, 50(10), 1861-1879. DOI: 10.1108/00251741211279648
Temple, P. (2014). Handbook on the Entrepreneurial University. London Review of Education, (12), Article 10. DOI: 10.18546/lre.12.2.10
Miller, K., McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2014). The changing university business model: A stakeholder perspective. R&D Management, 44(3), 265-287. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12064
McCann, L., Hutchison, N., & Adair, A. (2021). Calibration of stakeholder influence in the UK higher education sector. Studies in Higher Education, 47(7), 1502-1523. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2021.1916908 EDN: LYQVYN
Hurth, V., & Stewart, Ia. S. (2022). Re-purposing Universities: The path to purpose. Frontiers in Sustainability, 2, Article 762271. DOI: 10.3389/frsus.2021.762271
Paucar-Caceres, A., Cavalcanti-Bandos, M. F., Quispe-Prieto, S. C., Huerta-Tantalean, L. N., & Werner-Masters, K. (2021). Using soft systems methodology to align community projects with sustainability development in higher education stakeholders' networks in a Brazilian university. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 39(4), 750-764. DOI: 10.1002/sres.2818 EDN: XBOIPO
Nguyen, N. P., & Mogaji, E. (2022). Universities' Endowments in Developing Countries: The Perspectives, Stakeholders and Practical Implications. In Re-imagining Educational Futures in Developing Countries (pp. 261-282). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-88234-1_14
Radko, N., Belitski, M., & Kalyuzhnova, Y. (2022). Conceptualising the entrepreneurial university: The stakeholder approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-022-09926-0
Germain, E., Klofsten, M., Löfsten, H., & Mian, S. (2023). Science parks as key players in entrepreneurial ecosystems. R&D Management, 53(4), 603-619. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12536 EDN: VHNOHC
Leal Filho, W., Caughman, L., Pimenta Dinis, M. A., Frankenberger, F., Azul, A. M., & Salvia, A. L. (2022). Towards symbiotic approaches between universities, sustainable development, and cities. Scientific Reports, (12), Article 011433. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15717-2
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2021). A strategic alignment framework for the entrepreneurial university. Industry and Innovation, 29(2), 285-309. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2021.1941799 EDN: EQZDBD
Kola, A. M., & Leja, K. (2017). The Third Sector in the Universities' Third Mission. In (Ed.) Management and Culture of the University. In Ł. Sułkowski (Ed.) Management and Culture of the University (vol. 6, pp. 99-125). DOI: 10.3726/b10970
Солодухин К. С. Стратегическое управление вузом как стейкхолдер-компанией: Монография. Санкт-Петербург: Санкт-Петербургский политехнический университет Петра Великого, 2009. 289 с. EDN: QXYBTV
Нагорнов В. А., Перфильева О. В. Оценка роли вузов в региональном развитии: формирование устойчивых партнерств для взаимодействия // Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. 2010. Т. 5, № 4. С. 60-86. EDN: NDAHSX
Медушевский Н. А., Перфильева О. В. Интерпретация третьей роли университетов на современном этапе // Вестник РГГУ. Серия: Политология. История. Международные отношения. Зарубежное регионоведение. Востоковедение. 2016. № 3 (5). С. 19-31. EDN: YHCNAN
Саввинов В. М., Стрекаловский В. Н. Учет интересов стейкхолдеров в управлении развитием образования // Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. 2013. Т. 8, № 1. С. 87-99. EDN: PXFLPZ
Попова Е. С. Механизм взаимовлияния направлений регионального развития и стратегий вузов // Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления). 2012. № 2. С. 47-54. EDN: PGGBZB
Клемешев А. П., Кудряшова Е. В., Сорокин С. Э. Стейкхолдерский подход в реализации "третьей миссии" университетов // Балтийский регион. 2019. Т. 11, № 4. С. 114-135. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-4-7 EDN: KGBCAX
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853. DOI: 10.2307/259247 EDN: CRIHOB
Gaete Quezada, R. (2012). Pluralist university government: An analysis proposal based on stakeholder theory. RUSC. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, (9), Article 1412. DOI: 10.7238/rusc.v9i2.1412
Фурта С. Д., Соломатина Т. Б. Карта заинтересованных сторон - инструмент анализа окружения бизнеса // Инициативы XXI века. 2010. № 1. С. 22-27. EDN: MCLHBL
Krkač, K. (2021). Stakeholder Mapping. In S. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, M. del Baldo, & R. Abreu (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management (pp. 1-7). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_353-1
Елисеева В. А. Трудовая мотивация молодежи в современных российских условиях // Master's Journal. 2022. № 2. С. 100-113. EDN: GIZTXS
Цыганкова И. В., Потуданская В. Ф., Цзывэй Я. Факторы мотивации молодежи при выборе профессии // Экономика труда. 2019. Т. 6, № 4. С. 1545-1554. DOI: 10.18334/et.6.4.41349 EDN: EHANII
Манукян А. А. Профессиональная мотивация у студенческой молодежи // Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук. Социальные, гуманитарные, медико-биологические науки. 2022. Т. 24, № 85. С. 35-40. DOI: 10.37313/2413-9645-2022-24-85-35-40 EDN: IQAHCA
Токарева А. А., Баронене С. Г. Методика исследования вовлеченности сотрудников университета // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2019. Т. 23, № 1-2. С. 11-32. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2019.01-2.001 EDN: HPWLET
Юдин Г. Люк Болтански, Лоран Тевено. Критика и обоснование справедливости: Очерки социологии градов / Пер. с фр. О.В. Ковеневой, под ред. Н.Е. Копосова. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2013. 576 с. // Laboratorium: журнал социальных исследований. 2013. № 3. С. 126-129. ISBN: 978-5-4448-0079-9 EDN: UIIDUP
Долженко Р. А., Долженко С. Б. Профессиональные экспертные сообщества и их роль в решении социально-экономических задач // Вестник Омского университета. Серия: Экономика. 2019. Т. 17, № 3. С. 78-87. DOI: 10.25513/1812-3988.2019.17(3).77-87 EDN: EFOIHY
Долженко С. Б., Долженко Р. А., Харченко В. С., Назаров А. В. Деятельность профессиональных экспертных сообществ: особенности мотивации участников и оценка их вовлеченности // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2021. № 5 (165). С. 345-373. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.5.1834 EDN: URZZDL
Долженко Р. А., Назаров А. В. Социально-экономическое развитие страны в контексте санкционного давления // Экономическое развитие России. 2023. Т. 30, № 5. С. 8-18. EDN: TMBPHW
Chapleo, C., & Simms, C. (2010). Stakeholder analysis in higher education: A case study of the University of Portsmouth. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 14(1), 12-20. DOI: 10.1080/13603100903458034
Wagner Mainardes, E., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2012). A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships. Management Decision, 50(10), 1861-1879. DOI: 10.1108/00251741211279648
Temple, P. (2014). Handbook on the Entrepreneurial University. London Review of Education, (12), Article 10. DOI: 10.18546/lre.12.2.10
Miller, K., McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2014). The changing university business model: A stakeholder perspective. R&D Management, 44(3), 265-287. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12064
McCann, L., Hutchison, N., & Adair, A. (2021). Calibration of stakeholder influence in the UK higher education sector. Studies in Higher Education, 47(7), 1502-1523. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2021.1916908 EDN: LYQVYN
Hurth, V., & Stewart, Ia. S. (2022). Re-purposing Universities: The path to purpose. Frontiers in Sustainability, 2, Article 762271. DOI: 10.3389/frsus.2021.762271
Paucar-Caceres, A., Cavalcanti-Bandos, M. F., Quispe-Prieto, S. C., Huerta-Tantalean, L. N., & Werner-Masters, K. (2021). Using soft systems methodology to align community projects with sustainability development in higher education stakeholders' networks in a Brazilian university. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 39(4), 750-764. DOI: 10.1002/sres.2818 EDN: XBOIPO
Nguyen, N. P., & Mogaji, E. (2022). Universities' Endowments in Developing Countries: The Perspectives, Stakeholders and Practical Implications. In Re-imagining Educational Futures in Developing Countries (pp. 261-282). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-88234-1_14
Radko, N., Belitski, M., & Kalyuzhnova, Y. (2022). Conceptualising the entrepreneurial university: The stakeholder approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-022-09926-0
Germain, E., Klofsten, M., Löfsten, H., & Mian, S. (2023). Science parks as key players in entrepreneurial ecosystems. R&D Management, 53(4), 603-619. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12536 EDN: VHNOHC
Leal Filho, W., Caughman, L., Pimenta Dinis, M. A., Frankenberger, F., Azul, A. M., & Salvia, A. L. (2022). Towards symbiotic approaches between universities, sustainable development, and cities. Scientific Reports, (12), Article 011433. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15717-2
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2021). A strategic alignment framework for the entrepreneurial university. Industry and Innovation, 29(2), 285-309. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2021.1941799 EDN: EQZDBD
Kola, A. M., & Leja, K. (2017). The Third Sector in the Universities' Third Mission. In (Ed.) Management and Culture of the University. In Ł. Sułkowski (Ed.) Management and Culture of the University (vol. 6, pp. 99-125). DOI: 10.3726/b10970
Solodukhin, K. S. (2009). Strategic management of a university as a stakeholder company. Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University. EDN: QXYBTV
Nagornov, V. A., & Perfilyeva, O. V. (2010). Assessing the role of higher education institutions in regional development for sustainable partnership for cooperation. International Organisations Research Journal, 5(4), 60-86. EDN: NDAHSX
Medushevsky, N. A., & Perfilyeva, O. V. (2016). A contemporary interpretation of the universities' third role at present. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Political science. History. International relationships. Foreign Regional Studies. Oriental Studies, (3), 19-31. EDN: YHCNAN
Savvinov, V. M., & Strekalovsky, V. N. (2013). Meeting stakeholders' needs through effective university management. International Organisations Research Journal, 8(1), 87-99. EDN: PXFLPZ
Popova, E. S. (2012). The mechanism of mutual influence between the directions of regional development and the strategies of universities. Ars Administrandi, (2), 47-54. EDN: PGGBZB
Klemeshev, A. P., Kudryashova, E. V., & Sorokin, S. E. (2019). Stakeholder approach to the implementation of the ‘third mission' of universities. Baltic Region, 11(4), 114-135. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-4-7 EDN: KGBCAX ▼ Контекст
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853. DOI: 10.2307/259247 EDN: CRIHOB
Gaete Quezada, R. (2012). Pluralist university government: An analysis proposal based on stakeholder theory. RUSC. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, (9), Article 1412. DOI: 10.7238/rusc.v9i2.1412
Furta, S. D., & Solomatina, T. B. (2010). Stakeholder map as instrument for business environment analysis. XXI Century Initiatives, (1), 22-27. EDN: MCLHBL
Krkač, K. (2021). Stakeholder Mapping. In S. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, M. del Baldo, & R. Abreu (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management (pp. 1-7). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_353-1
Eliseeva, V. A. (2022). Labor motivation of young people in modern Russian conditions. Master's Journal, (2), 100-113. EDN: GIZTXS
Tsygankova, I. V., Potudanskaya, V. F., & Ziwei, Ya. (2019). Motivational factors for young people when choosing a profession. Russian Journal of Labor Economics, 6(4), 1545-1554. DOI: 10.18334/et.6.4.41349 EDN: EHANII
Manukyan, A. A. (2022). Professional motivation of students. Izvestiya of the Samara Russian Academy of Sciences Scientific Center. Social, Humanitarian, Medicobiological Sciences, 24(85), 35-40. DOI: 10.37313/2413-9645-2022-24-85-35-40 EDN: IQAHCA
Tokareva, A. A., & Baronene, S. G. (2019). University employee engagement study methodology. Journal University Management: Practice and Analysis, 23(1-2), 11-32. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2019.01-2.001 EDN: HPWLET
Юдин Г. Люк Болтански, Лоран Тевено. Критика и обоснование справедливости: Очерки социологии градов / Пер. с фр. О.В. Ковеневой, под ред. Н.Е. Копосова. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2013. 576 с. // Laboratorium: журнал социальных исследований. 2013. № 3. С. 126-129. ISBN: 978-5-4448-0079-9 EDN: UIIDUP
Dolzhenko, R. A., & Dolzhenko, S. B. (2019). Professional expert communities and their role in solving socio-economic problems. Herald of Omsk University. Series: Economics, 17(3), 78-87. DOI: 10.25513/1812-3988.2019.17(3).77-87 EDN: EFOIHY
Dolzhenko, S. B., Dolzhenko, R. A., Kharchenko, V. S., & Nazarov, A. V. (2021). Activities of professional expert communities: Features of participants' motivation and assessment of their engagement. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (5), 345-373. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.5.1834 EDN: URZZDL
Dolzhenko, R. A., & Nazarov, A. V. (2023). Socio-economic development of the country in the context of sanctions pressure. Russian Economic Developments, 30(5), 8-18. EDN: TMBPHW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Management Issues