Government and public administration
CONCEPTUALIZATION OF PUBLIC ELECTRONIC SERVICES: PUBLICITY ASPECT
Received: 15.03.2019 Published: 15.03.2019
UDC: [33:351]:004 EDN: HZTQSY DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2019-3-39-45
Full text
Abstract
The purpose of this article is conceptualization of public electronic services. It is noted that in e-government studies, the definition of "public" is used in most cases as a term that does not require explanation and, by default, means that the e-service is provided by a public sector organization. However, the term "public" is not as obvious as it might seem at first glance. With regard to information systems, the term "public" may also be interpreted as referring to the systems that are "available to the public", including all the services that may be available to the public, hence private electronic services are also referred to. As a methodology and principal methods the authors used: an interpretive approach; an interdisciplinary approach; a consistent convergence of denotative meanings of each element of the linguistic construction "electronic public services", a method of analysis and synthesis. Scientific novelty is in the critical analysis and interpretation of the aspect of publicity of electronic public services. According to the results of the study, a new interpretation and interpretation of the aspect of the publicity of electronic services are proposed. The purpose of the study was twofold: first, to explore public electronic services from an interdisciplinary point of view and, second, to offer a broad conceptual framework for understanding the researched phenomenon public electronic services. Taking into account interdisciplinary nature of e-government research and the complexity of the e-government service phenomenon itself, we do not believe that it is appropriate to try to formulate a single, universal definition of what public e-service means. There may be different level of detail and abstraction depending on the specific purpose of the research and disciplinary affiliation.
Keywords
How to cite
Для цитирования:
Еремеев С.Г., Большакова Ю.М. Концептуализация публичных электронных услуг: аспект публичности // Вопросы управления. 2019. Т. 39, № 3. С. 39–45. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-3-39-45
For citation:
Eremeev S., Bolshakova Y.M. CONCEPTUALIZATION OF PUBLIC ELECTRONIC SERVICES: PUBLICITY ASPECT // Management Issues. 2019. Vol. 39, no. 3. P. 39–45. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-3-39-45
How to Cite
Eremeev S., Bolshakova Y.M. CONCEPTUALIZATION OF PUBLIC ELECTRONIC SERVICES: PUBLICITY ASPECT // Management Issues. 2019. Vol. 39, no. 3. P. 39–45. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-3-39-45
References
- Sundgren B. What is a public information system // International Journal of Public Information Systems. 2005. 1. PP. 81-99.
- Orman Levent V. Public Information Systems // Information Society. 1989. 6: 1/2.
- Bozeman B., Bretschneider S. Public Management Information Systems: Theory and Prescription // Public Administration Review. 1986. №46. PP. 475-487.
- Scupola A., Henten A., Nicolajsen H. W. E-Services: Characteristics, Scope and Conceptual Strengths // International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications. 2009. 1(3). PP. 1-16.
- Lindgren I., Jansson G. Ecectronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework // Government Information Quarterly. 2013.30:2. PP. 163-172.
- Christensen T., Lægrid P., Roness P. G., Røvik K. A. Organisationsteori för offentlig sector. Malmö: Liber. 2005.
- March J. G., Olsen J. P. Democratic Governance. New York: The Free Press. 1995.
- Peters G. B. The Politics of Bureaucracy. London: Routledge. 2001.
- Johnston J. Public Relations and the Public Interest. New York: Routledge. 2016.
- Wheeler C. The public interest: we know it's important, but do we know what it means. In Creyke R. and Mantel A. (eds). AIAL Forum 48. Australian Institute of Administrative Law. 2006. PP. 12-26.
- Bozeman B. Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 2007.
- Rothstein B. Välfärdsstat, förvaltning och legitimitet. Politik som organization. Stockholm: SNS Förlag. 2010.
- Le Grand J., Bartlett W. The theory of quasi-markets. In Quasi-markets and social policy. Le Grand, J. and Bartlett W. (Eds.). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press. 1993.
- Lipsky M. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. 1980.
- Большакова Ю. М. Теория и практика реформирования сферы государственных и муниципальных услуг в развивающихся странах. - Сыктывкар, 2016.
- Fountain J. Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service // Governance. 2001. 14:1. P. 55-73.
- Scharpf F. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press). 1999.
- Nordhaus W. D. Paul Samuelson and Global Public Goods (A commemorative essay for Paul Samuelson) [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.econ.yale.edu/~nordhaus/ homepage/PAS and GPG.pdf
- Corley K., Gioia D. Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? 2011 // Academy of Management Review 36:1. PP. 12-32.
- Røvik K. A. Moderna organisationer: trender inom organisationstänkandet vid millennieskiftet. Malmö: Libe. 2000.
